有没有可能他在执行 S/R 时,他的工作没有被“保存”?
这似乎不太可能,Paratext Lite 会确保在执行 S/R 之前所有内容都已保存。
在 PTLite 中,什么操作会触发保存?我知道在 Paratext 中,除了 Ctrl-s 之外,切换到不同章节(以及其他操作)会使数据被保存。PTLite 中有类似的功能吗,还是它应该实时保存所有内容?
按下 Ctrl-S 确实会强制保存,但 Paratext Lite 会根据各种操作自动保存,例如更改章节、切换到另一个窗格、插入注释、执行 S/R 等。
该项目最近被转换为 Daughter project(子项目)。在转换之前他没有遇到问题,但现在遇到了。我不完全确定时间线是否一致,但这似乎是唯一重大的变化。在 Daughter project 中勾选复选框是否会影响数据是否被保存?
根据您描述的情况,我想不出这会有什么影响。
能否让用户从他们的设备上“提交反馈”?日志可能会告诉我们原因。
另外,如果您能告诉我项目的名称,我也可以查看一下。
Is it possible that his work wasn't "saved" when he did the S/R?
This doesn't seem likely, Paratext Lite makes sure everything is saved before S/R.
What triggers a save in PTLite. I know in Paratext, along with Ctrl-s, moving to different chapters (and other things) make the data get saved. Is there anything like that in PTLite, or should it be saving everything on the fly?
Pressing Ctrl-S does force a save, but Paratext Lite automatically saves based on various actions, eg. changing chapter, or switching to another pane, inserting a note, S/Ring etc.
This project was recently converted to a Daughter project. Prior to that conversion he didn't have problems, but he does now. I'm not 100% sure the timing is the same, but it seems like it's the only significant change. Does marking the check boxes in a Daughter project affect whether the data would be saved or not?
Based on what you described, I can't think why this would make a difference.
Is it possible to get the user to "Submit feedback" from their device? The log might tell us the cause of this.
Also if could you let me know the name of the Project then I could take a look at that as well.
机器翻译自 English