各位好，
在 lingtrans 的 Paratext-FLEx 整合教學 LingTranSoft Wiki | Paratext-FLEx 整合教學 中，列出了 PT 與 Flex 連結的許多功能和優勢。然而，最明顯的功能——拼字檢查（Spell check），卻未被列出。
由於字典通常作為正字法的參考標準，在 Paratext 中使用字典作為拼字檢查的參考似乎很合乎邏輯。目前 Paratext 的拼字檢查功能發展狀況如何？我們是否會在 PT 9.3、9.4 或 10.0 中看到 Flex 整合方面的重大進展？
在許多專案中，出版書籍中聖經文本的拼字準確度非常高，甚至無誤。Flex 內部具有針對當地語言（vernacular）的拼字檢查功能。能否讓 PTFLEX 使用來自 Paratext 的可信詞表來填充這個內部的當地語言 Flex 拼字檢查？這將是兩者之間極佳的交叉授粉（cross fertilisation）方式。
goodgoan.
Dear all,
On lingtrans` Paratext-FLEx Integration Tutorial LingTranSoft Wiki | Paratext-FLEx Integration Tutorial there are many features and advantages listed of a link between PT and Flex. The most obvious however , Spell check, is not listed.
As a dictionary normally serves as THE orthographic reference, to use the dictionary as spellcheck reference in Paratext seems logical. What does the spell-check future of Paratext look like at the moment? Are we going to see major advances in flex integration in PT 9.3, 9.4 or 10.0?
In many projects, the accuracy of the spelling of the Biblical text for published books is very high, if not without errors. Flex has an internal spell-check for the vernacular. Can PTFLEX be made to fill this internal vernacular flex spellcheck with trusted wordlists from Paratext? That would be great way of cross fertilisation between the two.
goodgoan.
機器翻譯自 English
