我在 Registry 中遇到了一些與 Back Translation 專案相關的問題,這些專案並未設定為基於母語翻譯的 BT 專案類型,也就是說,它們擁有獨立的註冊。在某些情況下,UBS(Sharon P)會將這些專案標記為有問題,因為系統顯示它們是(例如)第一份英文或法文翻譯。(抱歉,那個位置已經被佔用了…
)
Back Translation 設定的最佳實務是什麼?我假設,如果是從零開始,將 BT 設為該翻譯的 daughter 專案是最好的安排。目前擁有獨立註冊的 BT 專案可以轉換為這種狀態嗎?如果可以,該怎麼辦?如果不行(或者操作不簡單),是否最好將註冊更改為 Test/Training 專案,以免影響統計數據?
此外,似乎許多 Back Translation 專案將專案語言設定為母語翻譯的當地語言。應該使用 BT 的實際語言,對嗎?所以在我們大多數情境中,應該是法文或英文。我假設在專案中更正這一點會很好(這應該會顯示在 registry 中,對嗎?),以確保準確性。然後,如果是英文或法文,我們需要確保它要么是 daughter 專案,要么如果它有自己獨立的註冊,則應標記為 Test/Training,或標記為 New,而不是 First。
感謝您的意見。
jeffh
I’ve had several issues in the Registry with Back Translation projects that are not set up as a BT project type based on the mother translation, i.e. they have a separate registration. In some cases these are flagged as problematic by UBS (Sharon P) because it says it is (for example) the First translation into English or French. (Sorry that spot is already taken…
)
What is best practice for Back Translation configuration? I assume a BT daughter to the translation is the best arrangement, if you are starting from scratch. Can a currently existing BT with an independent registration be converted to that status? If so, how? If not (or it isn’t easy), would it be best to change the registration to a Test/Training project, so that it doesn’t mess up statistics?
Also, it seems like a lot of Back Translation projects set up the language of the project to be the vernacular language of the mother translation. You should use the actual language of the BT, correct? So French or English in most of our contexts. I assume it would be good to correct that in the project (which should then show up in the registry, correct?), so that it is accurate? And then if it is English or French, we need to make sure that it is either a daughter project, or if it has its own registration, that it is a Test/Training, or is marked as New, not First.
Thanks for your input.
jeffh
機器翻譯自 English