在我们项目的书卷引言中,我们使用经文引用来引导读者阅读特定段落。由于所有引用均限于该特定书卷内部,因此我们在经文引用中不包含书卷名称或书卷缩写。如果是简单引用(例如 11.4),Paratext 不会有问题。但如果我们使用复杂引用(例如 7.3-8),Paratext 会将其标记为“无效的中部标点符号”。我已反复检查了经文引用设置和数字设置,它们看起来设置正确。如果我加上书卷缩写(Eph 7.3-8),则运行正常。因此,我怀疑 Paratext 没有将其识别为经文引用,因为其中没有包含书卷缩写,而是使用了数字设置。如果我单独使用句点或破折号(7.3 或 3-8),它就不会被标记为错误。看起来 Paratext 不喜欢“数字/中部标点符号/数字/中部标点符号/数字”这种格式。但如果我在前面加上书卷名称,它就没问题。我们非常希望在新约各书卷的引言中保留这种经文引用格式,但如果在运行检查时,这种格式不被标记为错误,那就更好了。
In our project’s book introductions, we point the reader to certain passages using Scripture references. Since all the references are internal to that particular book, we don’t include the book name or book abbreviation in the Scripture reference. If we have a simple reference (such as 11.4), Paratext has no problem with it. But if we include a complex reference (such as 7.3-8), Paratext flags it as “invalid medial punctuation”. I have tripled checked both the Scripture reference settings and the Number settings, and they appear to be set correctly. If I add the book abbreviation (Eph 7.3-8), it works fine. So I suspect Paratext isn’t recognizing it as a Scripture reference since the book abbreviation isn’t included, and is using the number settings. If I use either the period or the dash alone (7.3 or 3-8), it’s not flagged as an error. It appears that Paratext doesn’t like the “number/medial punctuation/number/medial punctuation/number” format. Though it’s happy with it if I put a book name in front of it. We’d really like to keep this Scripture reference format in our book introductions, but it would also be nice to be able to run the check without this getting flagged as an error for each book of the New Testament.
机器翻译自 English