在我們的專案中，我們進行了大量的 PT 逐字對譯工作，其明確目標是幫助顧問和諮詢人員理解該語言，並減少 PT 的自動詞法分析（parsing）負載。我們已在 FLEx 中對非聖經數據進行了更精確且更具語言學導向的逐字對譯。我們的 FLEx 資料庫已與 PT 專案關聯多年，但我們尚未嘗試在 FLEx 中對聖經進行逐字對譯。我發現證據顯示 PT9 的逐字對譯器現在正在使用 FLEx 的詞彙條目，這非常好。
最近，我們一直在 FLEx 中編輯我們的非聖經逐字對譯文本。本週，當我們處理許多後綴（affix）條目時，我們看到了一些奇怪且令人擔憂的情況：看起來我們創建的 Paratext 非語言學形態斷詞（morpheme breaks）和註釋（glosses）正自動作為詞形（wordforms）傳送到 FLEx。我假設這是 PT 和 FLEx 逐字對譯合併趨勢的一部分，但這對我們目前的 FLEx 數據毫無幫助！
在我們專案工作的這個階段，我們不希望出現這種自動插入 FLEx 的情況，但如果這是一個新的有意功能，我們需要被告知，以便我們修改 PT 中的註釋程序。幸運的是，我們最近在 PT 中沒有對許多經節進行逐字對譯，但從我們的 FLEx 詞形 + 形態斷詞中篩選出不精確的 PT 條目將是一項大工程。
能否請有人向我指出 PT9 和 FLEx 在逐字對譯期間具體如何互動的說明？
能夠控制 PT 和 FLEx 之間傳輸的數據可能會非常有用：是否可以在 PT <–> FLEx、PT –> FLEx 和 FLEx –> PT 之間提供三向設置選項？
非常感謝 PT 和 FLEx 的偉大發展以及整合功能！我們非常感激；我們只需要知道這些變化如何影響我們的工作流程。
We have done a lot of PT interlinearization in our project, done expressly with the goal of helping advisors’ and consultants’ understand the language and to reduce the automatic parsing load for PT. We have done much more precise and linguistically oriented interlinearization on non-Scripture data in FLEx. We have had our FLEx database associated with the PT project for several years, but we have not attempted to interlinearize Scripture in FLEx. I have seen evidence that PT9 interlinearizer is now using FLEx lexical entries, which is great.
Recently we have been editing our non-Scripture interlinear texts in FLEx. This week while working with the many affix entries we see something weird and disturbing: It looks as though the Paratext non-linguistic morpheme breaks and glosses we create are being sent to FLEx automatically as wordforms. I assume this is part of the move toward merging PT and FLEx interlinearization, but it is not helpful for our FLEx data at this time!
This automatic insertion into FLEx is not desired at this point in our project work, but if it is a new intentional feature we need to be informed so we can modify our glossing procedures in PT. Fortunately we have not interlinearized many verses in PT recently, but it will be a big job to sort out the imprecise PT entries from our FLEx wordforms + morpheme breaks.
Can someone please point me to a description of how PT9 and FLEx specifically interact during interlinearization?
It might be very helpful to have control over which data is transferred between PT and FLEx: Could there be a 3-way settings choice between PT <–> FLEx , PT –> FLEx , and FLEx –> PT, perhaps?
Many thanks on the great development of both PT and FLEx and the integration features! We appreciate it very much; we just need to know how the changes are affecting our workflow.
機器翻譯自 English
