在我们的项目中，我们进行了大量的 PT 逐词对照工作，其明确目标是帮助顾问和咨询人员理解该语言，并减少 PT 的自动解析负担。我们在 FLEx 中对非圣经数据进行了更精确且更具语言学导向的逐词对照。我们的 FLEx 数据库与 PT 项目关联已有数年，但我们尚未尝试在 FLEx 中对圣经进行逐词对照。我注意到 PT9 的逐词对照工具现在正在使用 FLEx 的词汇条目，这非常好。
最近，我们一直在 FLEx 中编辑非圣经的逐词对照文本。本周，在处理许多词缀条目时，我们发现了一些奇怪且令人担忧的情况：看起来我们在 Paratext 中创建的非语言学形态切分和释义正在自动作为词形（wordforms）发送到 FLEx。我假设这是 PT 和 FLEx 逐词对照功能合并的一部分，但这对我们目前的 FLEx 数据没有帮助！
在我们项目工作的现阶段，我们不希望出现这种自动插入 FLEx 的情况，但如果这是一个新的有意功能，我们需要得到通知，以便我们可以修改 PT 中的释义程序。幸运的是，我们最近没有在 PT 中对很多经文进行逐词对照，但从我们的 FLEx 词形 + 形态切分中区分出不精确的 PT 条目将是一项艰巨的工作。
能否请有人指出 PT9 和 FLEx 在逐词对照过程中具体如何交互的说明？
能够控制 PT 和 FLEx 之间传输的数据可能非常有帮助：是否可以在 PT <–> FLEx、PT –> FLEx 和 FLEx –> PT 之间提供三种设置选项？
非常感谢 PT 和 FLEx 的出色发展以及集成功能！我们非常感激；我们只需要了解这些变化如何影响我们的工作流。
We have done a lot of PT interlinearization in our project, done expressly with the goal of helping advisors’ and consultants’ understand the language and to reduce the automatic parsing load for PT. We have done much more precise and linguistically oriented interlinearization on non-Scripture data in FLEx. We have had our FLEx database associated with the PT project for several years, but we have not attempted to interlinearize Scripture in FLEx. I have seen evidence that PT9 interlinearizer is now using FLEx lexical entries, which is great.
Recently we have been editing our non-Scripture interlinear texts in FLEx. This week while working with the many affix entries we see something weird and disturbing: It looks as though the Paratext non-linguistic morpheme breaks and glosses we create are being sent to FLEx automatically as wordforms. I assume this is part of the move toward merging PT and FLEx interlinearization, but it is not helpful for our FLEx data at this time!
This automatic insertion into FLEx is not desired at this point in our project work, but if it is a new intentional feature we need to be informed so we can modify our glossing procedures in PT. Fortunately we have not interlinearized many verses in PT recently, but it will be a big job to sort out the imprecise PT entries from our FLEx wordforms + morpheme breaks.
Can someone please point me to a description of how PT9 and FLEx specifically interact during interlinearization?
It might be very helpful to have control over which data is transferred between PT and FLEx: Could there be a 3-way settings choice between PT <–> FLEx , PT –> FLEx , and FLEx –> PT, perhaps?
Many thanks on the great development of both PT and FLEx and the integration features! We appreciate it very much; we just need to know how the changes are affecting our workflow.
机器翻译自 English
