首先感謝 @Phil_Leckrone 提供了非常有用且極其清晰的回答。我們有類似的需求,我能在幾分鐘內應用此解決方案。 其次,我來到這裡,起初沒有找到解決方案,因此正在準備提出另一個問題。另一位用戶在 2015 年有一個關於如何設置腳註標記字體 的問題,這也是我們的需求。 因此,希望某位超級用戶能將此處的標題編輯為更通用的內容,例如「如何在 PTXprint 中自定義腳註標記」。我認為這些腳註標記在聖經正文中承擔著如此重要且獨特的「職責」,許多項目都會希望改進它們 。PT 允許用戶提供自定義的「腳註標記序列」這一事實也支持了這種感覺。所以多年前我們對該選項進行了長時間的思考,並為我們的環境找到了一個很好的解決方案;現在我們一直在努力讓 PTXprint 呈現我們的解決方案。今天 Phil 的解決方案讓我們非常高興。 第三,我想給出我們的 +1 或 +10,以讓這個重要細節在 PTXprint 中更容易訪問。今天我花了大量時間研究這些特殊的腳註標記。它們甚至在 USFM 中沒有自己的標記,也沒有在 PTXprint 中為任何歷史原因設置樣式。它們很重要,但在我們的工具中卻像灰姑娘一樣被對待。請讓它們發光。我認為,PTXprint 使用 /v 的樣式作為腳註標記的默認樣式這一事實也需要關注。 第四,我想分享我們針對世界某個農村地區拉丁字母的解決方案,那裡識字率仍然很低,即使在 2026 年也是如此: 在 PT 中,我們將腳註標記定義為 U+2460 .. U+2473。這些被稱為「帶圈數字」 和「帶圈數字」 。這些小傢伙不會將正文中的詞語變成神秘詞語,也不會與節號混淆。它們相當明顯,而且由於我們沒有過度使用腳註,它們不會使頁面雜亂。 我們在当地發現,當腳註標記只是「字母」時,我們的目標受眾不會「注意到」它們,因為當然已經有「大量文本」。上標數字也是如此,因為有節號。因此,多年來,我們使用帶圈標記取得了良好的效果。希望對您有幫助
First thank you @Phil_Leckrone for a very helpful and super-well presented answer. We had a similar need and I could apply this solution within a few moments. Secondly, I had come here and had at first not found a solution, so was in the process of writing yet another question. One other user has a question from 2015 about how to set the font of the callers , which was also our need. So some super-user could make a bracket-question or edit the title here into something more generic like "How to customize footnote callers in PTXprint". I believe those callers are so weird and so important with their "job" in the main text of Scripture, that several projects would want to make them better . This feeling is also supported by the fact that PT allows users to provide their custom "footnote caller sequence". So we had a long think about that option many years ago and found a nice solution for our context; and now we had struggled to have our solution rendered by PTXprint. And Phil made us very happy today with his solution. Thirdly I want to give our +1 or +10 to make this important detail better accessible in PTXprint. I had to spend plenty time today, to research those exotic callers. They do not even have their own markers in USFM and no style in PTXprint for whatever historic reasons. They are important, but they get treated like Cinderella in our tools. Please let them shine. The fact that PTXprint is using the style for /v as default for footnote callers also needs attention, I believe. Fourthly I want to share our own solution for a latin script in a rural location of this world, where literacy is still struggling, even in 2026: In PT we have defined the footnote callers as U+2460 .. U+2473. Those are known as "circled digits" and "circled numbers" . Those little critters cannot change words of the main text into mystery words and they cannot be confused with verse numbers. They are quite distince, and since we are not over-using footnotes, they do not clutter our pages. We had found locally that our target audience does not "notice" footnote callers when they are "just letters", because there is already "lots of text", of course. Same for superscript numbers because of verse-numbers. So we are having good results, for years, with our circled callers. hth
機器翻譯自 English 顯示原文