首先感谢 @Phil_Leckrone 提供了非常有帮助且演示得极好的回答。我们有类似的需求,我能在几分钟内应用这个解决方案。 其次,我来到这里,起初没有找到解决方案,所以正在准备写另一个问题。另一位用户有一个 2015 年的问题,关于如何设置引用符的字体 ,这也是我们的需求。 所以,如果某个超级用户能创建一个括号问题,或者将这里的标题编辑得更通用一些,比如“如何在 PTXprint 中自定义脚注引用符”,那就好了。我相信这些引用符在圣经正文中的“工作”中是如此奇特且重要,以至于许多项目都会希望让它们变得更好 。PT 允许用户提供自定义的“脚注引用符序列”这一事实也支持了这种感觉。所以多年前我们曾长时间考虑过该选项,并为我们的语境找到了一个不错的解决方案;现在我们在让 PTXprint 渲染我们的解决方案时遇到了困难。而 Phil 今天用他的解决方案让我们非常高兴。 第三,我想给我们的 +1 或 +10,以在 PTXprint 中更好地访问这个重要细节。今天我花了大量时间研究这些奇特的引用符。它们在 USFM 中甚至没有自己的标记,在 PTXprint 中也没有样式,无论出于什么历史原因。它们很重要,但在我们的工具中却像灰姑娘一样被对待。请让它们发光。我相信,PTXprint 使用 /v 的样式作为脚注引用符的默认样式这一事实也需要关注。 第四,我想分享我们自己在世界某个农村地区拉丁文字解决方案,那里的识字率仍然很低,即使在 2026 年也是如此: 在 PT 中,我们将脚注引用符定义为 U+2460 .. U+2473。这些被称为“带圈数字” 和“带圈数字” 。这些小东西不会将正文中的单词变成神秘单词,也不会与节号混淆。它们非常独特,而且由于我们没有过度使用脚注,它们不会使我们的页面杂乱。 我们在当地发现,当脚注引用符只是“字母”时,我们的目标受众不会“注意到”它们,因为当然已经有“大量文本”。对于上标数字也是如此,因为节号的存在。所以多年来,我们使用带圈的引用符取得了良好的效果。希望这对您有帮助
First thank you @Phil_Leckrone for a very helpful and super-well presented answer. We had a similar need and I could apply this solution within a few moments. Secondly, I had come here and had at first not found a solution, so was in the process of writing yet another question. One other user has a question from 2015 about how to set the font of the callers , which was also our need. So some super-user could make a bracket-question or edit the title here into something more generic like "How to customize footnote callers in PTXprint". I believe those callers are so weird and so important with their "job" in the main text of Scripture, that several projects would want to make them better . This feeling is also supported by the fact that PT allows users to provide their custom "footnote caller sequence". So we had a long think about that option many years ago and found a nice solution for our context; and now we had struggled to have our solution rendered by PTXprint. And Phil made us very happy today with his solution. Thirdly I want to give our +1 or +10 to make this important detail better accessible in PTXprint. I had to spend plenty time today, to research those exotic callers. They do not even have their own markers in USFM and no style in PTXprint for whatever historic reasons. They are important, but they get treated like Cinderella in our tools. Please let them shine. The fact that PTXprint is using the style for /v as default for footnote callers also needs attention, I believe. Fourthly I want to share our own solution for a latin script in a rural location of this world, where literacy is still struggling, even in 2026: In PT we have defined the footnote callers as U+2460 .. U+2473. Those are known as "circled digits" and "circled numbers" . Those little critters cannot change words of the main text into mystery words and they cannot be confused with verse numbers. They are quite distince, and since we are not over-using footnotes, they do not clutter our pages. We had found locally that our target audience does not "notice" footnote callers when they are "just letters", because there is already "lots of text", of course. Same for superscript numbers because of verse-numbers. So we are having good results, for years, with our circled callers. hth
机器翻译自 English 显示原文