我很驚訝還沒有人回答這個問題……所以讓我分享我們的經驗。
是的，因為我們是分批出版的（每年出版一冊或一組經書），我們有一個獨立的專案，在這些「完成」的經書經過排版並送交印廠後，我們就將它們複製到該專案中。我們這樣做的主要原因是，我們正在為這些經書進行音訊錄製（使用 HearThis），以配合 Android 應用程式。與此同時，「主專案」持續進行精修——包括關鍵術語、拼寫和其他改進（這通常意味著最新的活文本與音訊不同步）。我們從不編輯該專案的副本。它是送印內容的靜態快照。
是的，當出版部分經書時（例如 GEN 或 PSA），我們可以複製整本經書，然後刪除尚未檢查和核准的部分。後來變得有點棘手，當您只需要為這些部分完成的經書添加新章節時（因為您真的不想複製整本經書——而是只想要新的章節）。
現在，隨著我們完成新約，讓最終修訂顧問查看自這些經書數年前核准出版以來，活文本中所有變更的內容，可能會很有幫助（透過比較靜態副本與專案的當前/最新副本）。當然，您也可以使用專案歷史記錄來做到這一點，但您必須知道對於每一冊經書而言，歷史中的哪個時間點是相關的）
所以，我不知道什麼是「最佳實務」，但這對我們來說確實運作得很好。
I’m surprised that no one else has answered this one yet… so let me pass on our experience.
Yes, because we publish incrementally, (either a single book or set of books each year) we have a separate project that we copy those “finished” books into once they have been typeset and sent to the printer. Our main reason for doing so is that we have been doing the audio recordings (using HearThis) of these books to go along with the Android App. Meanwhile the “main project” continues to be refined - with key terms, spelling and other improvements (which often mean that the latest living text is then out of sync with the audio). We never edit that copy of the project. It is a static snapshot of what went to press.
And yes, when publishing partial books (like GEN or PSA) we can copy across the whole book and delete what isn’t yet checked and approved. It gets a bit tricky later when you have to just add new chapters to these partially completed books (because you don’t really want to copy the whole book over - instead you want just the new chapters).
And now as we complete the NT, it may be helpful for the final revision consultant to see what all has changed in the live text since these books were approved for publication several years ago (by comparing the static copy with the current/latest copy of the project). Of course, you could also do this with project history, but then you would have to know exactly which point in history was relevant for each book)
So, I don’t know what the “best practice” is, but this certainly has worked well for us.
機器翻譯自 English
