我很惊讶目前还没有其他人回答这个问题……所以让我分享一下我们的经验。
是的，因为我们采用增量出版方式（每年出版单卷书或一组书卷），所以我们有一个独立的项目，一旦这些“已完成”的书卷经过排版并发送给印刷厂，我们就将它们复制到这个项目中。我们这样做的主要原因是，我们正在使用 HearThis 对这些书卷进行音频录制，以配合 Android 应用程序使用。与此同时，“主项目”仍在不断精化——包括关键术语、拼写和其他改进（这通常意味着最新的活文本与音频不同步）。我们从不编辑该项目的副本。它是送往印刷厂内容的静态快照。
是的，当出版部分书卷（如 GEN 或 PSA）时，我们可以复制整本书，然后删除尚未检查和批准的部分。后来当您需要向这些部分完成的书卷添加新章节时，情况会变得有点棘手（因为您并不想复制整本书——您只想要新的章节）。
现在，随着我们完成新约，最终修订顾问可能会希望查看自这些书卷几年前获得出版批准以来，活文本中发生了哪些变化（通过比较静态副本与项目的当前/最新副本）。当然，您也可以使用项目历史记录来完成此操作，但那样您必须确切知道对于每一卷 书而言，历史中的哪个时间点是相关的）
所以，我不知道“最佳实践”是什么，但这对我们来说确实运行得很好。
I’m surprised that no one else has answered this one yet… so let me pass on our experience.
Yes, because we publish incrementally, (either a single book or set of books each year) we have a separate project that we copy those “finished” books into once they have been typeset and sent to the printer. Our main reason for doing so is that we have been doing the audio recordings (using HearThis) of these books to go along with the Android App. Meanwhile the “main project” continues to be refined - with key terms, spelling and other improvements (which often mean that the latest living text is then out of sync with the audio). We never edit that copy of the project. It is a static snapshot of what went to press.
And yes, when publishing partial books (like GEN or PSA) we can copy across the whole book and delete what isn’t yet checked and approved. It gets a bit tricky later when you have to just add new chapters to these partially completed books (because you don’t really want to copy the whole book over - instead you want just the new chapters).
And now as we complete the NT, it may be helpful for the final revision consultant to see what all has changed in the live text since these books were approved for publication several years ago (by comparing the static copy with the current/latest copy of the project). Of course, you could also do this with project history, but then you would have to know exactly which point in history was relevant for each book)
So, I don’t know what the “best practice” is, but this certainly has worked well for us.
机器翻译自 English 显示原文
