0 votos
394 visualizações

We are having possible issues with send/receive over the Internet with a particular computer. Most of our computers are Linux, currently with PT 8.0, but we want to use one computer that has a good Internet connection, Windows. The envisaged workflow is to gather changes from several computers onto a USB drive, then get that onto the Windows computer, send/receive over the Internet, then back to the USB drive and out to the computers. That allows me, on the other side of the world, to be up to date.

The problem seems to be that the USB drive s/r works fine, but s/r to the Internet says that there are no changes, which doesn’t seem right. The Windows computer only has Observer role for the project, if that makes a difference.

Is this a problem that others have seen? Is there something in the different versions of Paratext on Windows and Linux that could be causing the problem? Or is it no problem actually?

JohnBrownie

Publicação antiga - exibida no idioma original
Paratext por (385 pontos) | 394 visualizações

3 Respostas

0 votos
Melhor resposta

Which version of Paratext is being used on the Windows machine? This sounds like an issue that I thought we fixed.

Publicação antiga - exibida no idioma original
por [Expert]
(16,7k pontos)

reexibida

Nevermind, we fixed the observer getting changes from the internet and being unable to give the changes via S/R to USB afterwards.

I think @sewhite is correct that S/R via the internet will require a non-observer to do the S/R.

Publicação antiga - exibida no idioma original

Hi everyone,

Thanks for the pointers. Changing the role to Consultant appears to have
fixed the issue. Hopefully we are good to go with this set-up now, as
I’m on my way out of the country again!

JohnBrownie

Publicação antiga - exibida no idioma original
0 votos

I suspect that the observer status might be an issue. Observer status means that computer only receives changes, doesn’t send them. I’d try upgrading that user to consultant or translator status and see if that makes a difference. A user can have translator status and not given permission to edit any books.

I think when you upgrade an observer to consultant or translator, Paratext will recommend that they delete the project from their computer and receive a new copy. This is because of ending that protection that observer changes don’t get transferred elsewhere. Since the latest changes from the local team members would still be on the USB drive, the Windows user could delete the project, get a new copy from the server, do send/receive from the USB then another send/receive to the Internet. Or if the administrator is one of the local team members, they could change the user’s status, send/receive that to the USB, the Windows user could delete the project then get a new copy from the USB, then send/receive to the Internet.

Publicação antiga - exibida no idioma original
por [Expert]
(3,3k pontos)
0 votos

One thing to check: Has the Windows computer first received the
changes from the USB drive, before doing S/R to the Internet? I
have seen this scenario:

  Computers A and B do S/R to a USB drive. Computer C inserts the

USB drive, then does S/R to the Internet. However, Computer C has
not yet received the changes from the USB drive! Make sure all
users know that an Internet S/R does not touch an inserted USB
drive.

  I teach this "up and down the mountain" sequence for S/R,

assuming three computers. Computer C has the only internet
connection. Steps 3 and 5 can get missed if it is assumed
that the data from the USB will be included in an Internet S/R
from Computer C:

  1. C sends everything to the Internet ,
    and receives any work from Non-Local
    team members:
    Computer C is
    now fully updated with (A)(B)©****(Non-Local)
  1. C
    receives A and B from the USB, and adds C:
    ** (A)(B)©** are on the USB
  1. C
    sends Non-Local to the
    USB:
    USB is fully updated with (A)(B)©****(Non-Local)
  1. B
    receives A’s work, and adds B:

** (A)****(B)** are on the USB

  1. B
    receives ©****(Non-Local) from the USB:
    B is fully updated with (A)(B)©****(Non-Local)
  1. A
    sends its own work to the USB: **
    (A)** is on the USB
  1. A
    receives (B)©(Non-Local) from the USB:
    ** A** is fully
    updated with (A)(B)©****(Non-Local)
    Sorry, Thunderbird formatting is a bit flaky. I have a graphic or
    a PPT/LO Presenter file to demonstrate this if anyone with decent
    Internet access wants it.
Publicação antiga - exibida no idioma original
por (670 pontos)
reexibida

Perguntas relacionadas

0 votos
2 respostas 302 visualizações
We are facing Send Receive Issues with Powari PtP project. From the admin computer neither do send nor receive the ... happening from last five months please help us on his.
anon480013 162 perguntada Dez 13, 2018
+1 voto
2 respostas 500 visualizações
Paratext Lite cannot access the default \Shared Paratext 8 Projects folder Follow these directions to do Send/Receive and move ... /Receive to USB. Now the Send/Receive will work.
[Moderator]
dhigby
1,3k
perguntada Abr 8, 2019
0 votos
2 respostas 362 visualizações
É possível, se um computador apresentou falha, mas o disco rígido ainda está acessível (via adaptador USB ou ... foram compartilhados via Send/Receive antes da falha. Obrigado,
[Moderator]
james_post
2,1k
perguntada Abr 13, 2022
0 votos
1 resposta 341 visualizações
Send/Receive to USB is grayed out, despite having an SD card mounted in an internal SD card reader. I know this worked ... 't. Using PT 9.0.100.10199 for Linux. Help appreciated!
Paul 642 perguntada Mai 26, 2020
0 votos
3 respostas 551 visualizações
I have successfully migrated my project to PT8. Now I'm trying to update my colleague's machine with S/R via USB ( ... by the way-is that normal?), and rebooted my machine.
Paul 642 perguntada Nov 17, 2018
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
All the believers were one in heart and mind. No one claimed that any of their possessions was their own, but they shared everything they had.
Acts 4:32
3,045 perguntas
6,005 respostas
5,671 comentários
2,026 usuários