0
406 次浏览

Today, from a real bit of text, I hit upon a new question:

Do I need to give each morpheme on each wordlist-entry, or can I work in a hierarchic fashion? I did not find anything on this in the help.

Example:

Already existing entry: thought (faŋa)

Also already existing entry: plural-marker+ thought (=thoughts) (a+ faŋa)

Today I need to enter: their thoughts. So can I enter

their+ thoughts (b+ afaŋa)

or do I need to enter

their+ plural-marker+ thought (b+ a+ faŋa)

I woulɖ not mind either way, but am curious of what PT8 can handle. And what advantages and disadvantages other users have found for either approach.

Can we agree that for HTML the CSS are an established working system, where the “C” is indeed helpful? It is on this background that I wonder how to handle all those regular nouns, plural-nouns, and all those possible prefixes in PT8.

Thank you.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
Paratext (934 分) 发布
已重新显示 | 406 次浏览

2 个回答

0
最佳答案

I am using the Biblical Terms based on stems/roots. If this is what you are interested in, then the answer is that PT is not hierarchic as far as I can see. Unlike AMPLE which is a powerful analyzer that reads from a root dictionary, a prefix dictionary and a suffix dictionary plus rules, PT is simple in that it works from a root/stem indicated in the Wordlist and ignores whatever prefixes and suffixes may be given.
In your example, the root is faŋa. For afaŋa you write a+ faŋa in the morphology column of the Wordlist. For bafaŋa you can write either b+ a+ faŋa or ba+ faŋa. PT only looks for the root/stem and the complete word. How many prefixes and suffixes there are is irrelevant. If you write b+ afaŋa you are telling PT that you have both a root faŋa and a stem afaŋa, so you would need to list both as definitions for thought(s) in the Biblical Terms. If you break down as b+ afaŋa, it cannot find bafaŋa from the root faŋa, only from the stem afaŋa. In my view that is not the best option, so I would write b+ a+ faŋa.
I do mark the various prefixes and suffixes because I like to have a record of the correct morphological breakdown, so a word like musatiinakwaa (their traps) I write as musat +iin +ak +waa (root, class marker, plural marker, possessive.) But PT is only interested in the root musat (which never occurs in this form except as a root in the Wordlist) and the fuil word musatiinakwaa. When musat is given as a definition in the Biblical Terms tool and as long as the words musatiinaa, musatiinak, musatiinacaato, musatiinakaap, musatiiŋwaa, musatiit, musatiitaap are all indicated in the Wordlist with the root musat, PT will happily find all these forms in the Biblical Terms check.


However, it will not find those places where we use the word for a different Hebrew or Greek term, because the Biblical Terms go by Hebrew words and Hebrew has various words for a trap or snare. So, in the screenshot you should see 8 words from the root musat. However, if I hold the cursor over the vernacular column in the Biblical Terms window I can see that it only found 4 of the 8 words, since the Wordlist is based on the vernacular and the Biblical Terms on the Hebrew/Greek. We also use a different word (stumbling block) for the same Hebrew word. It is complex, because we translate by context, not with word-for-word equivalents.
较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
(869 分) 发布

Great, thank you. Since you show so many words in the corner of your screenshot, please allow a practical question:

In each key-terms-work-session there is a need to hop from the key-terms-window to the relevant entry in the word-list, whenever the morphology is not yet entered or not confirmed.

I know how to click on the blue verse-link, find myself in the main text, right-click on the actual rendering (a word) and select go to wordlist. Many clicks times many key terms…

I cannot right-click and jump from the text which is shown in the bottom part of the key-terms-window.

Is there a more efficient way to go from the key-terms window to a certain entry in the wordlist?

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示

I am not aware of a more efficient way. I assume you are aware of the option to pin the window so that it is not minimized when you go to the main text window. Otherwise, you may try to complete the Wordlist before working on the Biblical Terms so that almost all words will already have an approved morphological breakdown.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
+1

No, Paratext does not work in that hierarchic fashion that you described. However, it should hopefully learn as you go, so it would start suggesting (b+ a+ faŋa) as its guess so you just have to press the OK button making it faster/easier the more you do.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
[Expert]
(16.7k 分) 发布

相关问题

0
2 个回答 301 次浏览
在我们工作的语言中,某些词缀和附着语素通过连字符与词干分隔 这个连字符在语言设置中被定义为词中标点 现在,在形态学字段中,Paratext 有时会做出错误的猜测,因为它忽略了这类连字符 例如,它将 khøuwa-te 的形态猜测为 ... 态学猜测器不会将任何包含连字符的字符序列视为一个语素? 如果没有,我将建议增加这样一个功能 谢谢, rfkvg
Roland 245 发布 提问于 十二月 1, 2021
0
2 个回答 504 次浏览
我正在处理一个已经包含带有形态学断词(morphological breaks)的词表的项目 是否可以将该词表加载到词表工具(Wordlist tool)中?对于连字符断词,有 hyphenatedWords.txt 文件 是否有类似的文件用于存储形态学数据? ... 但我没有在项目文件夹中看到词表数据 如果能有一个简短的教程说明其机制,我将不胜感激
Kent Spielmann 1.8k 发布 提问于 三月 30, 2021
0
4 个回答 668 次浏览
项目基于词干(stem-based)的设置已经顺利运行好几个星期了 该语言会产生许多复合词 它们可以是名词 动词 形容词以及 更糟糕 的组合 当然,这些成分的组合是有 规则 的,而且合乎逻辑,每个复合词都可以 ... 言,他们说 overmother (过度母亲/大母亲),其中 mother 是意为 母亲 的词干, over 是意为 μέγας 的前缀 )
Tim 934 发布 提问于 四月 24, 2019
0
2 个回答 641 次浏览
我目前正在处理词表(Wordlist),为了确保自己是最新版本,我刚安装了 Paratext 9.2 在词表(Wordlist)中,针对 Aezek (这是 Isaac 的音译)的形态(Morphology)字段,列出了两个出现实例,如下所示: / ... 口就会消失 如果您对这些中的任何一点有任何见解,我很乐意听到您的意见 谢谢 rfkvg
Roland 245 发布 提问于 十一月 30, 2021
+1
3 个回答 483 次浏览
我们地区的一位语言学家正在询问使用 Paratext 形态学功能的最佳方式 她主要使用这些功能来辅助拼写检查,同时也用于确认译员所做的选择类型 我认为她并没有使用形态学功能来处理诸如《圣经》术语之类的问题 在试图帮助她时,我面临的一个 ... 对其他单词的形态(以及可能的逐词对照猜测)做出有根据的猜测?它如何处理那些在表层形式中看起来截然不同的底层语素?
Stephen Katt 1.3k 发布 提问于 十月 7, 2020
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
I appeal to you, brothers and sisters, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree with one another in what you say and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly united in mind and thought.
1 Corinthians 1:10
3,049 个问题
6,007 个回答
5,673 条评论
2,029 位用户