0 votes

In the language we work some affixes and clitics are separated from the stem by hyphens. This hyphen is defined in the language settings as word-medial punctuation.

Now in the Morphology field Paratext sometimes makes wrong guesses because it ignores such hyphens. For example, it guesses the morphology of ‹khøuwa-te› as /khøuwat-e/. Both ‹khøuwat› and ‹-e› do exist as morphemes, but here it should be clear because of the hyphen that the morphology should be ‹khøuwa› and ‹-te›, which are also already defined as morphemes.

Is there a setting anywhere I could adjust so that the Paratext Morphology guesser will not treat any character string with a hyphen in it as one morpheme?

If not, I’m going to suggest such a feature.

Thanks,
rfkvg

Paratext by (234 points)

2 Answers

+1 vote
Best answer

It does seem that “word-medial punctuation” by definition implies a morpheme break in most cases, so the parser should prioritize a break at those hyphens. If hyphen represents a “phoneme” i a language should it not be included in the list of alphabetical characters?

by (630 points)
0 votes

Forgot to mention that I’m otherwise very impressed with the morphology guesser! It’s an immense time saver!

by (234 points)

Sometimes Paratext needs a few corrections of a similar type in order to learn a pattern and to begin to make good guesses. I have no idea whether the presence of a hyphen is confounding the guesses though.
Does manually correcting hyphenation or morphology in their respective columns in the Wordlist (accessed via the View menu) cause Paratext to learn the rules you’d like it to understand? Do subsequent suggestions from Paratext guess the morphemes more reliably? Or have you tried this and found that Paratext keeps guessing badly?

Thanks for that, IanH.
On the whole Paratext is quite good at learning the rules. However, in this specific case both guesses would be equally correct if there wasn’t a hyphen in the orthography. It seems that Paratext is just ignoring such hyphens. It would be great if there was a way to tell Paratext not to ignore them.

Related questions

0 votes
3 answers
+1 vote
3 answers
Paratext Oct 7, 2020 asked by Stephen Katt (1.2k points)
0 votes
4 answers
+1 vote
0 answers
Paratext Oct 12, 2021 asked by [Expert]
sewhite
(3.1k points)
+1 vote
1 answer
Paratext Oct 31, 2017 asked by SIL LSS PNG (411 points)
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
Every day they continued to meet together in the temple courts. They broke bread in their homes and ate together with glad and sincere hearts, praising God and enjoying the favor of all the people. And the Lord added to their number daily those who were being saved.
Acts 2:46-47
2,626 questions
5,364 answers
5,041 comments
1,420 users