假设译员为 προσκαλέω 选择了 2 种语境敏感的译法:我们可以将其注释为 "call.to.come" 和 "send.someone.to.bring"。 基于词根的匹配效果很好,因此将这两种译法输入到 关键术语译法 工具中会获得很多漂亮的勾选标记,译员们也很满意。 由于 call.to.come 是一个相对生僻且并非所有人都能理解的词,经过测试后,决定为其添加一个词汇表条目。
目前(至少在 9.3.103.16 版本中),如果我指示 Paratext 自动链接关键术语条目,最终会出现一些奇怪的条目,例如:
and they \w sent.someone.to.bring|call.to.come\w* the apostles back in.
这个链接本不应该被插入。此时我有两个选择: 1. 撤销操作并手动完成所有链接。 2. 我需要搜索并替换包含管道符/斜杠 (|) 的内容,和/或手动删除错误的条目。 我很希望能被证明是错的! 此外,如果该部分后面确实出现了 实际的 call.to.come ,由于误报,它会被跳过,导致读者疑惑该词的含义,和/或为什么没有“去词汇表查找”的标记。 因为我们使用的是基于词根的匹配,Paratext 拥有 正确执行此操作所需的信息 - 例如,它可以将其链接的匹配限制为仅那些与词汇表条目具有相同词根的匹配 - 只是目前似乎无法做到这一点.... a 请告诉我我错了,并且某处隐藏着某个控制选项?
Let's assume the translators have chosen 2 context-sensitive renderings for προσκαλέω: which we might gloss as "call.to.come" and "send.someone.to.bring". Root-based matching is working well, so entering both renderings into the key terms renderings tool gets lots of nice ticks, and the translators are happy. As call.to.come is a slightly rare word which not everyone understands, after testing it's decided to add a glossary entry for it.
At present, (at least, in 9.3.103.16), if I instruct paratext to automatically link keyterm entries, then we end up with weird entries like:
and they \w sent.someone.to.bring|call.to.come\w* the apostles back in.
That link shouldn't have been inserted. At that point I have 2 options: 1. Hit undo and do all the linking manually. 2. I need to search-and-replace for things with a pipe/bar (|) and/or manually delete the wrong entries. I'd love to be proven wrong! Also, if there's an actual call.to.come later on in the section, then it gets skipped because of the false positive, resulting in readers wondering what that word means, and/or why there's no 'go hunt in the glossary' marking. Because we're using stem-based matching, Paratext has the information it ought to need to get this right - e.g. it could restrict the matches it links to only ones that have the same stem as the glossary entry - it just doesn't seem to be able to do that at the moment.... a Please tell me I'm wrong, and there's a control lurking somewhere?
机器翻译自 English 显示原文