重新發佈為新帖子,而不是回覆舊帖子。
是否有標準方式來請求向 Paratext 新增資源,或擴大 Paratext 中現有資源可供使用的機構範圍?
我注意到 DBL 中有幾項韓文資源未在 Paratext 中提供。有些資源雖然在 Paratext 中可用,但似乎邏輯上應更廣泛開放(例如,開放給已核准機構的子機構),卻僅限於特定機構使用。在這種情況下,我很好奇是否是因為某些機構獲准使用這些資源,而後來又新增了更多機構(或子機構)……

過去幾天,我們收到了兩項關於(額外)韓文資源的不同請求。
對於未在 Paratext 中的資源:在 DBL 中,我可以看到其中一項來自 Biblica,該機構目前更積極參與 Paratext。另一項來自韓國聖經公會,該機構已核准兩項韓文資源供 Paratext 使用。這些細節或許對我們有利?但接下來,誰是最適合與這些機構聯繫以請求變更的人選?
在 Paratext 中可用的資源可供某些父機構使用,但許多(?)子機構無法使用,這可能只是疏忽所致。以下為一些範例:粗體機構擁有存取權限,非粗體機構則沒有:
- SIL International
- SIL Pacific Area
- SIL Asia Mainland Area
- CanIL
因此,這部分涉及流程問題(最佳做法是什麼,誰應該發起聯繫?),部分涉及具體問題(是否可能讓這些韓文資源可用或更廣泛地可用?)。
謝謝,
james_post
Reposting as a new , instead of a reply to an old one.
Is there a standard way to request new resources be added to Paratext, or to expand the orgs resources already in Paratext are available to?
I see a few resources in Korean in the DBL that are not in Paratext. And some are available in Paratext, but are restricted to specific organizations when it seems logical that they would be more widely available (i.e., to sub-orgs of already approved orgs). In this case, I’m curious if what happened is certain organizations were approved to use them, and then more organizations (or sub-organizations) were added…

We’ve had 2 different requests in the last few days regarding (additional) Korean resources.
For the resources that are not in Paratext: In the DBL, I can see that one is from Biblica, and they are now more involved in Paratext. And the other is from the Korean Bible Society, which has already approved 2 Korean resources for use in Paratext. Maybe those details would work in our favor? But then who is the best person to initiate contact with those orgs to request these changes?
The ones that are available in Paratext are available to some parent orgs, but not many (?) sub-orgs, which may just be an over-sight. Some examples are below: bolded orgs have access, non-bolded orgs to do not:
- SIL International
- SIL Pacific Area
- SIL Asia Mainland Area
- CanIL
So part of this is a process question (what’s the best way to do this and who should initiate contact?), part of it is a specific question (would it be possible to make these Korean resources available/more widely available?).
Thanks,
james_post
機器翻譯自 English