我們專案中有一台電腦安裝了大量的資源（ressources），因此即使在網路狀況不佳的日子，我們仍然可以查詢許多內容。這沒什麼問題，算是個不錯的功能。只是清單很長，使用者很難記住我們那裡所有的資源。
昨天我花了些時間，想看看並試用一些令人驚嘆的新增強版資源（Enhanced Ressources）。我前往下載清單，透過刪除舊版並下載/安裝新版，將一些資源從經典版「切換」為增強版。
我犯了一個未察覺的錯誤：其中一個資源是某個逐字對照（interlinear）設定中的參考或模型。假設是 RSV52。當我刪除經典版時，我沒有意識到 PT（或其逐字對照模組）會將此變更視為「模型遺失」，但我本該更清楚這一點，因為電腦就是這樣：不同的標籤（tag）代表不同的東西；即使包含的內容相同（甚至更多）。
這在當天稍後導致專案的「傳送/接收」（send/receive）對話框中出現了一連串令人困惑的「已變更」標籤。我花了一陣子才意識到，暫時失去模型資源這件事，讓 PT 認為所有逐字對照專案都「已變更」，儘管我已經撤銷了我的小錯誤。
所以我只是分享這個情況，以防其他使用者覺得有興趣。也是給自己的提醒。
一個不錯的功能會是：當使用者嘗試刪除某個「涉及/需要/使用中」的資源時，PT 能給出提示或警告；例如該資源是逐字對照設定的模型。
沒有資料或工作遺失，而且這個功能構想比我之前提交的一些關於實際問題的內容來得次要。我可以將此歸咎於我自己注意力不集中（因為我急著想動手玩一些新的「增強版玩具」）。
希望對您有幫助，問候
We have got one machine in a project where we have a massive amount of ressources installed, so even on bad-internet-days, we can potentially look up many things. No problem, nice to have. Just the list is long and one user cannot easily memorize all we have got there.
Now it happened yesterday that I took some time and wanted to see and try some of those amazing new Enhanced Ressources. Went to the download list and “toggled” some ressources from classic to enhanced by deleting the old and downloading/installing the new.
I made this mistake, without noticing: One ressource was the reference or model for one of the interlinear setups. Let us say RSV52. When I deleted the classic, I did not realize that PT (or its interlinear module) would consider this change “a loss of model”, but I should have known better, because computers are like that: different tag — different beast; even if the same goodness (and more) is included.
This has later in the day caused a storm of puzzling “changed” tags in the project send/receive dialog. Took me a while to realize that the fact of temporarily losing the model-ressource meant to PT that the interlinear projects were all “changed” even though I had already undone my little mistake.
So I am just sharing this in case some other user might find it interesting. And as note to self.
A nice feature would be a hint or warning from PT when a user is trying to delete a ressource that is “involved/needed/engaged” somehow; for example as a model for an interlinear configuration.
No data or work was lost and this feature-idea is less important than some other things I have submitted about real problems. I can mark this as my own lack of concentration (as I was drooling to get my hands on some new “enhanced toys”).
hth and greetings
機器翻譯自 English
