這個問題我們已經思考很久了(我想我在這個論壇上常這麼說),它不僅涉及單字的核准,還涉及字元與標點符號的核准。
正如大家所注意到的,目前的 Wordlist 和 Inventories 只允許團隊對單字進行「所有位置」或「無任何位置」的核准,但情況很少這麼簡單。我們規劃的解決方案會在 Wordlist 和 Inventories 中,以獨立的欄位顯示單字(或字元)在經文與非經文位置中的狀態。
根據位置指定核准的功能將提供給有此需求的用戶。對於不需要此功能的用戶,則不強制要求。
這些變動的早期跡象可以在 PT9.2 的 Find 中看到。這允許用戶在「Verse text」或「All text」中搜尋(「non-verse text」即將推出™️)。此外,Wordlist 不再在每一行都有三個按鈕來設定單字的核准狀態。相反地,狀態是根據目前選取的列,在欄位標題中設定的。這是因為當我們加入非經文文字的欄位(以及在研讀本聖經專案中,另一個欄位會顯示研讀本聖經材料)時,每行 6 到 9 個按鈕的「牆面」會顯得有些壓迫。下方的 Characters Inventory 模型很好地展示了 Wordlist 將呈現的樣子。預設情況下,核准經文文字中的單字也會核准其在非經文文字中的狀態;但在非經文文字中核准單字,不會核准該單字在經文文字中的狀態。

image1049×622 73.1 KB
我們之前沒有想到需要一個獨立的連字符清單。這是我們需要記住的一點。
大家可能都在好奇這什麼時候會實現。這可能會在 9.4 版本中推出(不保證)。
This issue has been on our minds for a long time (I think I say that a lot on this forum) and it relates to approval of not just words, but also characters and punctuation.
As you all have noted, the Wordlist and Inventories currently only let teams approve words “everywhere” or “nowhere”, but things are rarely that simple. The solution we have planned shows the status of words (or characters) in scripture and non scripture locations in separate columns in the Wordlist and inventories.
Specifying approval according to location will be available to those who want it. It will not be required for those who do not need it.
The early signs of these changes can be seen in Find in PT9.2. This allows users to search in “Verse text” or “All text” (‘non-verse text’ coming "soon"™️). Also, the Wordlist no longer has three buttons in every row for setting approval of words. Instead, status is set in the column header according to the active row. This is because when we add a column for non-verse text (and in Study Bible projects, another column shows for study bible material), the “wall” of 6-9 buttons per row becomes a bit overwhelming. A mockup of the Characters Inventory below gives a good idea of how this would look in Wordlist. By default, approving a word in verse text will also approve it in non-verse text; approving a word in non-verse text does not approve that word in verse text.

image1049×622 73.1 KB
We hadn’t thought of there being a need for a separate hyphenation list. That’s something for us to bear in mind.
You’re probably all wondering when this will be implemented. It may be in 9.4 (no guarantees).
機器翻譯自 English