这个问题我们已考虑了很长时间(我想我在这个论坛上经常这么说),它不仅涉及对词语的批准,还涉及对字符和标点的批准。
正如大家所指出的,目前的 Wordlist 和 Inventories 仅允许团队对词语进行“全局”或“无”批准,但实际情况往往并非如此简单。我们计划中的解决方案将在 Wordlist 和 Inventories 中通过单独的列显示词语(或字符)在经文和非经文位置的状态。
根据位置指定批准的功能将可供需要的人使用。对于不需要此功能的人,它不是强制性的。
这些变更的早期迹象可以在 PT9.2 的 Find 中看到。这允许用户在“Verse text”或“All text”中进行搜索(“non-verse text”即将推出™️)。此外,Wordlist 不再在每一行中提供三个用于设置词语批准的按钮。相反,状态是根据活动行在列标题中设置的。这是因为当我们添加非经文文本列(以及在 Study Bible 项目中,另一列显示研究圣经材料)时,每行 6-9 个按钮的“墙”会显得有点令人不知所措。下面的 Characters Inventory 模型很好地展示了 Wordlist 中的外观。默认情况下,批准经文文本中的词语也会批准非经文文本中的该词语;批准非经文文本中的词语不会批准经文文本中的该词语。

image1049×622 73.1 KB
我们之前没有考虑到需要单独的连字符列表。这是我们需要注意的一点。
大家可能都在好奇这何时会实现。它可能会在 9.4 版本中推出(不保证)。
This issue has been on our minds for a long time (I think I say that a lot on this forum) and it relates to approval of not just words, but also characters and punctuation.
As you all have noted, the Wordlist and Inventories currently only let teams approve words “everywhere” or “nowhere”, but things are rarely that simple. The solution we have planned shows the status of words (or characters) in scripture and non scripture locations in separate columns in the Wordlist and inventories.
Specifying approval according to location will be available to those who want it. It will not be required for those who do not need it.
The early signs of these changes can be seen in Find in PT9.2. This allows users to search in “Verse text” or “All text” (‘non-verse text’ coming "soon"™️). Also, the Wordlist no longer has three buttons in every row for setting approval of words. Instead, status is set in the column header according to the active row. This is because when we add a column for non-verse text (and in Study Bible projects, another column shows for study bible material), the “wall” of 6-9 buttons per row becomes a bit overwhelming. A mockup of the Characters Inventory below gives a good idea of how this would look in Wordlist. By default, approving a word in verse text will also approve it in non-verse text; approving a word in non-verse text does not approve that word in verse text.

image1049×622 73.1 KB
We hadn’t thought of there being a need for a separate hyphenation list. That’s something for us to bear in mind.
You’re probably all wondering when this will be implemented. It may be in 9.4 (no guarantees).
机器翻译自 English