+1 票
274 次浏览

There appear to be two obstacles to using the interlinearizer to create a Back Translation of the Glossary.

(1) The Glossary doesn’t have verse numbers. However, verse numbers can be temporarily added for breaking up the text for purposes of interlinearization, then removed.

(2) Even with verse numbers added, the interlinearizer tool doesn’t work in GLO. I’m guessing this is because there is no appropriate model text. But there’s no way of telling. There’s no error. The tool opens but won’t go past 1:0 (chapter 1, verse 0), even as I navigate through verses (in both the project text and the corresponding BT text).

Hack: After adding verse markup to the Glossary, I can copy the GLO text into some chapter of Scripture that hasn’t be translated yet. (Our glossary has 82 entries right now, so I chose Numbers 7, a nice long chapter.) The interlinearizer now works (but in NUM). I can interlinearize the glossary, copy the results from NUM to the GLO book of the BT, then remove verse numbers - and delete NUM.

But is there a non-hacky way to do this? It would be nice for the interlinearizer to do two things: (1) treat \k like a verse in GLO so that we don’t have to add verse numbers, and (2) actually work in the GLO book.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
Paratext 中 由 (296 分) 发布 | 274 次浏览

2 个回答

+1 票
最佳答案

In Paratext 7 and 8, in the extra books, chapter and verse numbers worked mostly as they did in the normal books of scripture. There were problems, but you could navigate using chapter and verse numbers, both for the interlinearizer and for the same extra book in another language, such as translating a tract/story book, etc, from one language (eg.English or Lozi) to another, with the interlinearizer producing the glosses that could then be exported to a back translation document. If you to the end of a chapter and were trying to go to the next verse, it would not go to the next chapter, but choosing the next chapter in the tool bar would go there. This worked without any model text. In Paratext 9, this “feature” (if it was a feature) seems to have been broken. It would useful is this could be restored.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
由 (136 分) 发布
+1 票

I was told once that there is no support for verse numbers in the glossary or extra books (like XXA). It would also be a big help for our team if we could use the interlinearizer to back translate these books without adding verse numbers.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
由 (1.3k 分) 发布

相关问题

0 票
6 个回答 1.3k 次浏览
我们有一个小型术语表(目前只有 1 页),我们正在使用逐词对照工具(interlineariser)来提供回译 为了便于最近一次顾问检查时的打印输出以及导航,我遍历了术语表并添加了节号,使用 \vp 以便在出版时将数字替换为字母 例如: \v ... 工具完全停止工作 有没有一种方法可以分段术语表,使逐词对照工具能够接受?针对这种情况的最佳实践是什么?
anon542642 294 发布 提问于 二月 21, 2022
0 票
1 个回答 75 次浏览
我们在脚注交叉引用中使用了 /xt,设置为使用书籍的“短名”。但在词汇表中,我想使用书籍名称的缩写,是否有不同的 USFM 代码可以实现这一点?
Lenice 182 发布 提问于 十月 7, 2025
0 票
4 个回答 840 次浏览
我正在尝试使用一款可以显示 Paratext Interlinearizer 词库的软件。 然而,Glossy 和 Glossinator(用于 Paratext 8)都无法正常工作。运行 Glossy (go.bat) 时,屏幕上没有任何显示。Glossinator 8.exe 根本无法运行。 我想知道如何让这些程序正常工作。
anon838041 109 发布 提问于 二月 9, 2022
0 票
3 个回答 576 次浏览
逐词对照工具中建议释义的顺序是怎样的? 换句话说,如果你点击一个释义并看到下拉列表,这个顺序仅仅是该项目历史中各种可能释义被选择的先后顺序吗?它看起来并不是按频率排序的,尽管按频率排序似乎更合乎逻辑。
mnjames 1.9k 发布 提问于 九月 11, 2018
0 票
0 个回答 204 次浏览
Is there a way to extract the Find/Replace history from the Project History? I found that I could do this: ... other suggestions, I'd appreciate those as well. Thanks, james_post
[Moderator]
james_post
2.1k 发布
提问于 八月 6, 2020
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it.
Matthew 16:18
3,060 个问题
6,021 个回答
5,689 条评论
2,035 位用户