+1 голос
274 просмотров

There appear to be two obstacles to using the interlinearizer to create a Back Translation of the Glossary.

(1) The Glossary doesn’t have verse numbers. However, verse numbers can be temporarily added for breaking up the text for purposes of interlinearization, then removed.

(2) Even with verse numbers added, the interlinearizer tool doesn’t work in GLO. I’m guessing this is because there is no appropriate model text. But there’s no way of telling. There’s no error. The tool opens but won’t go past 1:0 (chapter 1, verse 0), even as I navigate through verses (in both the project text and the corresponding BT text).

Hack: After adding verse markup to the Glossary, I can copy the GLO text into some chapter of Scripture that hasn’t be translated yet. (Our glossary has 82 entries right now, so I chose Numbers 7, a nice long chapter.) The interlinearizer now works (but in NUM). I can interlinearize the glossary, copy the results from NUM to the GLO book of the BT, then remove verse numbers - and delete NUM.

But is there a non-hacky way to do this? It would be nice for the interlinearizer to do two things: (1) treat \k like a verse in GLO so that we don’t have to add verse numbers, and (2) actually work in the GLO book.

Старое сообщение — показано на исходном языке
Paratext от (296 очков) | 274 просмотров

2 Ответов

+1 голос
Лучший ответ

In Paratext 7 and 8, in the extra books, chapter and verse numbers worked mostly as they did in the normal books of scripture. There were problems, but you could navigate using chapter and verse numbers, both for the interlinearizer and for the same extra book in another language, such as translating a tract/story book, etc, from one language (eg.English or Lozi) to another, with the interlinearizer producing the glosses that could then be exported to a back translation document. If you to the end of a chapter and were trying to go to the next verse, it would not go to the next chapter, but choosing the next chapter in the tool bar would go there. This worked without any model text. In Paratext 9, this “feature” (if it was a feature) seems to have been broken. It would useful is this could be restored.

Старое сообщение — показано на исходном языке
от (136 очков)
+1 голос

I was told once that there is no support for verse numbers in the glossary or extra books (like XXA). It would also be a big help for our team if we could use the interlinearizer to back translate these books without adding verse numbers.

Старое сообщение — показано на исходном языке
от (1,3тыс. очков)

Похожие вопросы

0 голосов
6 ответов 1,3тыс. просмотров
У нас есть небольшой глоссарий (на данный момент 1 страница), и мы используем инструмент интерлинеаризации для создания ... принимал его? Какова лучшая практика в этом случае?
anon542642 294 задал вопрос фев 21, 2022
0 голосов
1 ответ 75 просмотров
Мы используем /xt в перекрёстных ссылках в сносках, настроенных на использование короткого названия книги. Но в глоссарии ... код USFM, который я мог бы использовать для этого?
Lenice 182 задал вопрос окт 7, 2025
0 голосов
4 ответов 840 просмотров
Я пытаюсь использовать программное обеспечение, которое отображает лексикон Paratext Interlinearizer. Однако и Glossy, ... понимаю, как заставить эти программы работать правильно.
anon838041 109 задал вопрос фев 9, 2022
0 голосов
3 ответов 576 просмотров
Каков порядок предложенных глосс в инструменте интерлинеаризации? Другими словами, если вы нажимаете на глоссу и получаете ... по частотности, хотя это кажется наиболее логичным.
mnjames 1,9тыс. задал вопрос сен 11, 2018
0 голосов
0 ответов 204 просмотров
Is there a way to extract the Find/Replace history from the Project History? I found that I could do this: ... other suggestions, I'd appreciate those as well. Thanks, james_post
[Moderator]
james_post
2,1тыс.
задал вопрос авг 6, 2020
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
For where two or three gather in my name, there am I with them.
Matthew 18:20
3,060 вопросов
6,021 ответов
5,689 комментариев
2,035 пользователей