0
466 次瀏覽

I was asked if it is possible to limit the books that a person is able to make notes in. The person has had a problem where another person was making to many notes, and notes in books that they should not have been commenting. Is there a way to limit the scope of where the consultant role can make notes?

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
Paratext (478 點) 提出
已重新顯示 | 466 次瀏覽

3 個回答

0
最佳回答

But you can create a seperate project and ask the consultant to make their remarks there. In fact, since most of the time a consultant will not know the language he / she is checking, it makes more sense to ask the consultant to make notes in the backtranslation project. If you want to keep your project clean, I would either ask the C to make notes in the backtranslation project or create a daughter project used for checking only.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
(347 點) 提出

I’ve never heard of a consultant putting their notes in a back translation project. At typesetting time, I want to know that all consultant notes are resolved before I will typeset and you alarm me if they are being put in a different project than the translation itself. If a consultant were to use a different project than the translation itself, they will need to make sure themselves that those responsible for signing off on the publication are aware that the consultant notes are elsewhere or the job could be published without it being released properly. And now I’ll have to specifically ask each project where their consultant notes are.

You could ask the consultant to make notes to himself in a separate project and keep only real consultant notes in the translation project. It seems a very odd request to me unless somehow the consultant notes were irrelevant.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示

I just talked to a
translation consultant (whom I know well). She says that she
puts consultant notes in the back translation if it’s a project
in a script she can’t read. When everything is resolved she
writes a consultant report. The team will need to make these
consultant reports available to the publisher, so presumably
they could also be available for the typesetter.

PADev.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示

I am also a consultant who generally writes my notes in the back translation unless the translation team asks me to put the notes in another place. I do not write up my report until I see that everything has been resolved. Then I provide the report to that team as well as their administration.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示

Hello Shegnada,
How wonderfully different workflow can be from one country to the next. in 95% of cases I know about the consultant does not know the language he/she is checking. Thus they work with the backtranslation and in all the cases I know about prepares his/her questions in that backtranslation project. Only the exceptionally gifted consultants who know a language in the language family could make sens of the text they are checking and sometimes request access to the target language projet. . . . And quite frankly, this way of working keeps the translation project remarks scope to the team itself . . . (until typesetting that is).

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
0

No you can’t limit which books someone can write notes in.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
(9.9k 點) 提出
已重新顯示

But what about the elephant in the room this question brings up: Maybe it SHOULD be possible to lock books so that only people with permission can actually write notes in a book.

(Yes, I know each users’ notes are kept in a separate HTML file in each project folder and the various comments are tracked with GUIDs. So I suspect adding a lock to a book for a particular user might be very complicated with this kind of implementation. But that doesn’t address the “use-case” where it would be nice to stop people from commenting on books they have not business making notes in.)

So the answer is “No, you can’t.” but might it not be a feature people would find useful and possibly worth implementing?

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
0

Thank you all for replies, I did not think it was possible, but wanted to make sure. As the consultant is outside of my particular organization, I’m not aware how familiar that individual is with what is possible in Paratext (ie Consultant notes project). I’ll pass that suggestion on.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
(478 點) 提出

相關問題

0
3 個回答 685 次瀏覽
I have a user who is considering moving from Paratext 7.5 to 8 and she has a question about how to get the notes ... doesn't always copy within the program" Thank you, MSEAIT/LT
MSEAIT_LT 478 提出 已提問 6月 7, 2017
0
4 個回答 400 次瀏覽
受訓顧問需要練習撰寫筆記,因此最好讓他們最初的嘗試僅由其顧問導師或主管看到 我認為使用顧問筆記專案(consultant notes project)可以做到這一點 受訓顧問可以建立一個顧問筆記專案,將其與他的顧問導師共享,並將筆記新增到這 ... 一般專案中 然後,顧問導師可以評估這些筆記,如果筆記有效,就可以使用「multi」功能將其新增到一般專案中
[Expert]
sewhite
3.3k 提出
已提問 6月 3, 2021
0
2 個回答 545 次瀏覽
我們已完成新約的翻譯,目前正在進行舊約的翻譯工作。其中一位譯者詢問,目前是否有可能製作一份新約的對照譯文,且其中的註釋(glosses)使用目標語言。我推測這意味著需要翻譯對照譯文中使用的所有註釋,這將是一項不輕的任務。但使用內建的對照譯文功能是否可行?有沒有辦法在其中提供自訂的註釋?或者是否有其他方法可以實現這一點?
JohnBrownie 385 提出 已提問 6月 28, 2023
0
1 個回答 20 次瀏覽
與其將備註指定給 <team>,然後手動輸入「給釋經者」(等等)--如果他希望從我們這裡而不是從翻譯者那裡收到訊息--我們的顧問更希望能將備註指定給團隊的子類別 也就是說,除了個別翻譯者的清單外,還能將備註指定給「翻譯者」 ... 而 Penny Wise 則屬於「審查者」和「團隊」清單 這是否可行?還是我需要告訴他,他必須選擇「團隊」並使用旗標機制?
DG 1.1k 提出 已提問 2月 25
0
1 個回答 206 次瀏覽
Yes, if someone adds a comment to a note there is a very high probability it means they think it needs to be discussed ... make it unresolved they have a one click way to do that.
匿名 提出 已提問 5月 7, 2015
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it.
Matthew 16:18
3,045 個問題
6,005 個回答
5,671 則評論
2,026 位使用者