0
464 次浏览

I was asked if it is possible to limit the books that a person is able to make notes in. The person has had a problem where another person was making to many notes, and notes in books that they should not have been commenting. Is there a way to limit the scope of where the consultant role can make notes?

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
Paratext (478 分) 发布
已重新显示 | 464 次浏览

3 个回答

0
最佳答案

But you can create a seperate project and ask the consultant to make their remarks there. In fact, since most of the time a consultant will not know the language he / she is checking, it makes more sense to ask the consultant to make notes in the backtranslation project. If you want to keep your project clean, I would either ask the C to make notes in the backtranslation project or create a daughter project used for checking only.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
(347 分) 发布

I’ve never heard of a consultant putting their notes in a back translation project. At typesetting time, I want to know that all consultant notes are resolved before I will typeset and you alarm me if they are being put in a different project than the translation itself. If a consultant were to use a different project than the translation itself, they will need to make sure themselves that those responsible for signing off on the publication are aware that the consultant notes are elsewhere or the job could be published without it being released properly. And now I’ll have to specifically ask each project where their consultant notes are.

You could ask the consultant to make notes to himself in a separate project and keep only real consultant notes in the translation project. It seems a very odd request to me unless somehow the consultant notes were irrelevant.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示

I just talked to a
translation consultant (whom I know well). She says that she
puts consultant notes in the back translation if it’s a project
in a script she can’t read. When everything is resolved she
writes a consultant report. The team will need to make these
consultant reports available to the publisher, so presumably
they could also be available for the typesetter.

PADev.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示

I am also a consultant who generally writes my notes in the back translation unless the translation team asks me to put the notes in another place. I do not write up my report until I see that everything has been resolved. Then I provide the report to that team as well as their administration.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示

Hello Shegnada,
How wonderfully different workflow can be from one country to the next. in 95% of cases I know about the consultant does not know the language he/she is checking. Thus they work with the backtranslation and in all the cases I know about prepares his/her questions in that backtranslation project. Only the exceptionally gifted consultants who know a language in the language family could make sens of the text they are checking and sometimes request access to the target language projet. . . . And quite frankly, this way of working keeps the translation project remarks scope to the team itself . . . (until typesetting that is).

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
0

No you can’t limit which books someone can write notes in.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
(9.9k 分) 发布
已重新显示

But what about the elephant in the room this question brings up: Maybe it SHOULD be possible to lock books so that only people with permission can actually write notes in a book.

(Yes, I know each users’ notes are kept in a separate HTML file in each project folder and the various comments are tracked with GUIDs. So I suspect adding a lock to a book for a particular user might be very complicated with this kind of implementation. But that doesn’t address the “use-case” where it would be nice to stop people from commenting on books they have not business making notes in.)

So the answer is “No, you can’t.” but might it not be a feature people would find useful and possibly worth implementing?

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
0

Thank you all for replies, I did not think it was possible, but wanted to make sure. As the consultant is outside of my particular organization, I’m not aware how familiar that individual is with what is possible in Paratext (ie Consultant notes project). I’ll pass that suggestion on.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
(478 分) 发布

相关问题

0
3 个回答 685 次浏览
I have a user who is considering moving from Paratext 7.5 to 8 and she has a question about how to get the notes ... doesn't always copy within the program" Thank you, MSEAIT/LT
MSEAIT_LT 478 发布 提问于 六月 7, 2017
0
4 个回答 400 次浏览
受训顾问需要练习撰写笔记,如果他们的初步尝试仅由其顾问导师或主管可见,可能效果最佳。 我认为使用顾问笔记项目可以实现这一点。受训顾问可以创建一个顾问笔记项目,将其与其顾问导师共享,并将笔记添加到该顾问笔记项目中,而不是添加到常规项目中。然后,顾问导师可以评估这些笔记,如果笔记有效,就可以使用“多”(multi)功能将其添加到常规项目中。
[Expert]
sewhite
3.3k 发布
提问于 六月 3, 2021
0
2 个回答 545 次浏览
我们已完成新约翻译,目前正在从事旧约翻译工作。其中一位译者询问,目前是否有可能制作一份新约的逐词对照(interlinear),且其中的释义(glosses)使用目标语言。我假设这意味着需要翻译逐词对照中使用的所有释义,这将是一项艰巨的任务。但使用内置的逐词对照功能是否可行?是否有办法在其中提供自定义释义?或者是否有其他方法可以实现这一目标?
JohnBrownie 385 发布 提问于 六月 28, 2023
0
1 个回答 20 次浏览
与其将注释发送给 <team>,然后手动输入 给解经者 (等等)--如果他想从我们这里而不是从翻译那里收到他们的消息--我们的顾问更希望能将注释发送给团队的子类别 也就是说,除了个人翻译的列表之外,还能将注释发送给 翻译 ... ,而 Penny Wise 属于 审校者 和 团队 列表 这可行吗?还是我需要告诉他,他必须选择 团队 并使用标记机制?
DG 1.1k 发布 提问于 二月 25
0
1 个回答 206 次浏览
Yes, if someone adds a comment to a note there is a very high probability it means they think it needs to be discussed ... make it unresolved they have a one click way to do that.
匿名用户 发布 提问于 五月 7, 2015
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
Just as a body, though one, has many parts, but all its many parts form one body, so it is with Christ.
1 Corinthians 12:12
3,045 个问题
6,005 个回答
5,671 条评论
2,026 位用户