0 votes
337 vues

I have a colleague who is being frustrated with the English interlinearizing of the Greet NT source text in Paratext 8. She sites several differences from the Paratext 7 glosses and feels that the choices for word glosses are interpretive (and at times not at all the interpretation she would choose!). She is wondering if it is possible to access the English glosses from the Paratext 7 version?

Some examples she gives are:
Rev. 1:1 the Greek verb didomi is glossed as “appoint” rather than "give."
Rev 1:3 the Greek word kairos is glossed as “end-time” rather than simply "time."
Romans 1.1 the Greek noun euangelion is glossed as “cause.of.the.gospel” rather than simply "gospel."
Romans 1.3 sarx is “mortal nature” rather than "flesh."
Romans 1.5 pistis is “doctrine” rather than “faith” which is not an interpretation in the English and French translations . . .

Since the resources are in different formats in Paratext 7 and 8, they are not directly interchangeable, but if we could get a copy of the glosses as a Paratext project then it could be added as an alternative gloss (even though that would mean losing the French gloss). But then I don’t know what, if any, implications that may have on copyright restrictions. But I thought it was worth asking.

Ancienne publication - affichée dans sa langue d'origine
Paratext par (222 points) | 337 vues

2 Réponses

0 votes
Meilleure réponse

Issues around meanings and the number of senses each source language word has are common because there are many opinions on how these should be handled. I suppose that is why Paratext has several Greek lexicons for example. Should we request a new feature that the glosses in the Source Language Tool be editable?

Ancienne publication - affichée dans sa langue d'origine
par [Expert]
(2,9k points)

I agree, going with BART is much more helpful. The one thing (or two) PT has up on BART is the special dictionaries for Human made things and Animals and Plants, the dictionary for the LXX and the OT semantic domains dictionary. And in BART you can add your own notes, if you don’t like something or as a reminder…

Ancienne publication - affichée dans sa langue d'origine
0 votes

If you are able to use BART or AGNT in Translator’s Workplace you will get
much better glosses. BART is most helpful because of the powerful search
tools.

Ancienne publication - affichée dans sa langue d'origine
par (869 points)
réaffiché

Questions connexes

0 votes
2 réponses 582 vues
The instructions for 7.6β say: You must ensure that the other members of the project team have upgraded Paratext before ... for sure that they really were on the latest version.
wdavidhj 1,4k posée juin 18, 2015
0 votes
0 réponses 162 vues
The national translators often enter a gloss, then change their mind about the spelling or about the gloss in general. We ... in the word list, can be eliminated. Is that possible?
anon084052 157 posée févr. 10, 2018
0 votes
3 réponses 421 vues
Paratext 9.2 adds a new Source Language Text resource: OHEB/OGRK (the Open Scriptures Hebrew Old Testament and the ... different? Different glosses? Is there any reason to switch?
viverechristus 296 posée déc. 23, 2021
0 votes
2 réponses 330 vues
I am typesetting an Interlinear project. Everything is fine but a verse is not rendering properly (see screenshot ... 'site' referenced before assignment PTXprint Version 2.4.16
Sajid Imdad 110 posée mars 12, 2024
0 votes
3 réponses 361 vues
I am currently involved with a project which is working on an LWC interlinear as a source text for other ... Source</TranslationInfo> <ResourceText>T</ResourceText> Thanks, mnjames
mnjames 1,9k posée août 11, 2015
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin.
1 John 1:7
3,044 questions
6,003 réponses
5,671 commentaires
2,026 utilisateurs