0 votes
307 views

I have a colleague who is being frustrated with the English interlinearizing of the Greet NT source text in Paratext 8. She sites several differences from the Paratext 7 glosses and feels that the choices for word glosses are interpretive (and at times not at all the interpretation she would choose!). She is wondering if it is possible to access the English glosses from the Paratext 7 version?

Some examples she gives are:
Rev. 1:1 the Greek verb didomi is glossed as “appoint” rather than "give."
Rev 1:3 the Greek word kairos is glossed as “end-time” rather than simply "time."
Romans 1.1 the Greek noun euangelion is glossed as “cause.of.the.gospel” rather than simply "gospel."
Romans 1.3 sarx is “mortal nature” rather than "flesh."
Romans 1.5 pistis is “doctrine” rather than “faith” which is not an interpretation in the English and French translations . . .

Since the resources are in different formats in Paratext 7 and 8, they are not directly interchangeable, but if we could get a copy of the glosses as a Paratext project then it could be added as an alternative gloss (even though that would mean losing the French gloss). But then I don’t know what, if any, implications that may have on copyright restrictions. But I thought it was worth asking.

Paratext by (215 points) | 307 views

2 Answers

0 votes
Best answer

Issues around meanings and the number of senses each source language word has are common because there are many opinions on how these should be handled. I suppose that is why Paratext has several Greek lexicons for example. Should we request a new feature that the glosses in the Source Language Tool be editable?

by [Expert]
(2.9k points)

I agree, going with BART is much more helpful. The one thing (or two) PT has up on BART is the special dictionaries for Human made things and Animals and Plants, the dictionary for the LXX and the OT semantic domains dictionary. And in BART you can add your own notes, if you don’t like something or as a reminder…

0 votes

If you are able to use BART or AGNT in Translator’s Workplace you will get
much better glosses. BART is most helpful because of the powerful search
tools.

by (869 points)
reshown

Related questions

0 votes
0 answers 151 views
The national translators often enter a gloss, then change their mind about the spelling or about the gloss in general. We ... in the word list, can be eliminated. Is that possible?
anon084052 157 asked Feb 10, 2018
0 votes
2 answers 519 views
The instructions for 7.6β say: You must ensure that the other members of the project team have upgraded Paratext before ... for sure that they really were on the latest version.
wdavidhj 1.4k asked Jun 18, 2015
0 votes
3 answers 402 views
Paratext 9.2 adds a new Source Language Text resource: OHEB/OGRK (the Open Scriptures Hebrew Old Testament and the ... different? Different glosses? Is there any reason to switch?
viverechristus 296 asked Dec 23, 2021
0 votes
3 answers 332 views
I am currently involved with a project which is working on an LWC interlinear as a source text for other ... Source</TranslationInfo> <ResourceText>T</ResourceText> Thanks, mnjames
mnjames 1.9k asked Aug 11, 2015
0 votes
3 answers 326 views
What is the order of the suggested glosses in the interlinearizer tool? In other words, if you click a gloss and ... frequency, though that seems like it would be most logical.
mnjames 1.9k asked Sep 11, 2018
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
Don’t you know that you yourselves are God’s temple and that God’s Spirit dwells in your midst?
1 Corinthians 3:16
3,037 questions
5,994 answers
5,661 comments
2,022 users