在源语言中,我有一个短语动词 wasa mana ,意为“照料/照顾”。这本质上是一个动词“看/注视”和一个通用介词“在/关于/对于/通过/用……”的组合,该介词可能带有宾语,也可能不带。在我的源语言词典中,我收录了 wasa (动词)“看/照料”、ma (介词缩写形式)“UPS”、-na(以及其他介词宾语条目)“3s.O3”,同时也收录了 wasa mana(名词短语)“他/她/它照料他/她/它”,并且将其定义为短语动词(PHRASAL VERB):



但是,在解析文本时,我通常是逐词解析的,如下面路加福音 20:28 的例子所示:

在前两个例子中,wasa 和 ma 之间有一个插入词。这些在起草模块(drafting module)中传输正常。但在第三个实例中,wasa 未能合成(synthesize),而 mana 却合成得很好。这是怎么回事?


In the source language, I have a phrasal verb wasa mana 'tend to/care for'. This is essentially a verb 'watch' and a universal preposition 'in/on/at/for/with/by...' which may or may not have an object. In my source lexicon, I have an entry for wasa (verb) 'watch/tend', ma (prep short form) 'UPS', -na (& entries for other prepositional objects) '3s.O3', and also for wasa mana (noun phrase) 'he/she/it tends to him/her/it', which is also defined as a PHRASAL VERB:



But, often when I am parsing the text, I am parsing each word, as in the following example from Luke 20:28:

In the first two examples, there is an intervening word between wasa and ma. These transfer fine in the drafting module. But in the third instance, the wasa fails to synthesize, while the mana sythesizes just fine. What is going on here?


机器翻译自 English