0 votes
Transliterating from roman script to the traditional script works well. But the lemma in \w...\w* is not transliterated, even though the keyword in the GLO file is. How do I flag the lemma as needing transliteration? Or do I need to transliterate these words externally to Paratext? Surely links to the glossary will fail in SAB if the lemma does not match the keyword?
Paratext by (123 points)

1 Answer

0 votes
I checked the Paratext code and the it looks like the lemma for \w surface form|lemma\w* should be transliterated, so I'm not sure why it is a problem for your project.

Please send a problem report so we can look at the details of your project.
by [Administrator]
(3.1k points)
I have seen that Paratext will not transliterate the lemma if the \w is embedded in another marker.

<\tl \+w efoodi|efood\+w*\tl*>   -> failure to transliterate after |

but another marker can be embedded in the \w and it will transliterate

<\w \+tl efoodi\+tl*|efood\w*>.     -> transliterates OK
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
For just as each of us has one body with many members, and these members do not all have the same function, so in Christ we, though many, form one body, and each member belongs to all the others.
Romans 12:4-5
2,628 questions
5,369 answers
5,045 comments
1,420 users