0 votes
177 views

I’m having a problem with footnote and cross-reference callers… Here’s a sample:

\f + \fr 2:4 \fk Keyword \ft Text text text text… \f*

This shows a superscript ‘a’ following the ‘keyword’ in Standard View, and Checking > Run Basic Checks… > Markers doesn’t show any errors. Unfortunately, PrintDraft doesn’t produce the callers; the footnotes / cross-references appear fine at the bottom of the page, though they don’t have callers either…

The only thing I can think might be causing problems is the following line in PrintDraftChanges.txt:

#===========================================================================================

INSERT HAIR-SPACE BETWEEN CLOSING QUOTE MARKER AND FOOTNOTE/CROSS-REFERENCE CALLER

#===========================================================================================

INSERT HAIR-SPACE

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

'(”\\qt\*)(\\x)' > '\1\u2009\2'          # Adds a hair space between quote and cross reference

However, commenting this line out doesn’t cause the callers to show.

I’d appreciate your help with this.

Paratext by (642 points) | 177 views

1 Answer

0 votes
Best answer

If the custom.sty file has marker v set to nonpublishable, (which makes a printdraft without verse numbers) footnote and cross reference caller symbols do not appear.

by [Expert]
(3.3k points)

Related questions

0 votes
1 answer 231 views
The character entered after the opening marker indicates what caller will be used in the text. In Unformatted view, you ... view, the character(s) you define will be displayed.
[Expert]
anon421222
735
asked Feb 23, 2017
0 votes
3 answers 361 views
Cross reference caller by default uses (-) but in this particular project, all the callers which use the (-) symbol are ... why is this happening. image1366 717 82.5 KB Need help.
TSNgaihte 220 asked Jun 26, 2020
0 votes
1 answer 803 views
I'm a bit confused why USFM defines separate footnote and cross reference containers. Is it simply so that they can be ... is there a better forum to ask this sort of question?
mnjames 1.9k asked Jan 22, 2020
+1 vote
8 answers 1.1k views
I have a team who is getting lots of errors in the marker check: Footnote caller is not the expected value (*) ... majority are the errors with only a minority of correct ones.
anon703820 219 asked Dec 7, 2017
0 votes
2 answers 47 views
I must have changed the location of the footnote caller to be put by default at the beginning of the selected portion of ... it? Is there an easier way than to move them manually?
PeterK 119 asked May 5, 2025
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
Dear friends, since God so loved us, we also ought to love one another.
1 John 4:11
3,041 questions
5,996 answers
5,663 comments
2,022 users