0
534 次瀏覽

Our team would like to add cross references which refer to the same book without stating the book name.

E.g. inside the book of Matthew, to have a footnote saying something like "for more information on this topic also see \xt 2:34\xt* "

I can’t get this to work and still pass the reference checks. Of course we could simply leave those as unmarked (no \xt marker), but then we would lose the ability to quickly check if the reference is the correct one, and we would lose the ability to hot-link the references in future digital publications.

Is there any way to set up the Scripture Reference Settings so that a reference with no book name means “the current book”?

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
Paratext (1.9k 點) 提出
已重新顯示 | 534 次瀏覽

1 個回答

0
最佳回答

It should work to just have the chapter and verse referring to the current book. I just tried it in a test project and it works fine for me.
What is the error message you are getting?

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
[Expert]
(16.7k 點) 提出

anon848905, thanks for the hack which looks like it might fit our purposes to some extent, though they obviously wouldn’t let us click the link and check the attached passage.

anon291708, in your test project did you just have a reference like \xt 2:34\xt*? I know you can type out the book name if it’s self-referential, but we’re trying to have xrefs that don’t include a book name at all.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示

Yes, I tried it directly in the text and in a cross reference. See 1KI 10:26 in my screenshot (I know this is 9.0, but it should act the same in 8.0):

That’s why I was wondering what error message you got. Maybe the error message is unrelated to not having a book specified.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示

Arrrgh. You’re completely right.

The problem was the reference was typed in our old format, and so was failing the test. So if you just have chapter:verse (formatted correctly :smile:) and no book name, it works exactly the way I had hoped.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示

Yes, I have seen several projects with cross-references internal to books and was wondering what has “broken” to keep this from working. I do know of one project that used the book name “Kap” for all cross references in the same book, but they could not pass the Scripture reference checks either.

By the way, the \ior…\ior* and \xt…\xt* markers are routinely used in book introductions and pass the Scripture reference checks. If this ever stops work, please report the bug.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示

And that is why anon291708 is so valuable! He knows things - and asks good questions. Thanks anon291708! I will retract my previous suggestion so as not to confuse the issue.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示

相關問題

+1
1 個回答 252 次瀏覽
如果這個問題已經被問過或討論過,或者在某處的手冊中有說明,請見諒! 我想知道是否有辦法檢查我們的交叉引用是否按順序列出聖經書卷,以及格式是否正確 例如,要找出這個錯誤: 詩篇 132:11;撒母耳記下 ... 是路加福音 3:2, 12;4:8) 我已經執行過引用的基本檢查(Basic Checks),但這些問題沒有被偵測到 謝謝, anon953007
anon953007 213 提出 已提問 1月 25, 2021
0
1 個回答 33 次瀏覽
我們在很多地方於交叉引用的關鍵字/引文或腳註文字中使用了 \+nd Here\+nd* 標記檢查(在 Run basic checks 中執行)會將這些標記為「標記不能出現在這裡」 範例: \v 4 \f + \fr 6:4 \ft ... it* 我已拒絕這些錯誤,但 DBL 上傳檢查仍然失敗 在交叉引用和腳註中,正確處理這些樣式的方式是什麼?
gregbac 141 提出 已提問 1月 19
0
1 個回答 97 次瀏覽
由於 USFM 文件中的細節不足,且我無法在此找到答案, 請您說明以下情況的正確語法: - Our Esther Greek uses many publisher verses (\vp) e.g ... -6257-43be-a2b8-dbf3a2359a4a%2D%2D%3E-->|ESG 10:13\xta \+it k\+it*\x*
gregbac 141 提出 已提問 1月 9
0
1 個回答 230 次瀏覽
在我們的一個專案中,我們在所有草稿完成並檢查完畢後,使用 Paratext 中的「插入交叉引用」工具插入了腳註。這導致交叉引用出現在節首而非節末。請問有人有穩健的正則表達式(regex),可以將這些交叉引用移至節末嗎?
anon251522 150 提出 已提問 6月 7, 2023
0
1 個回答 328 次瀏覽
有沒有辦法將交叉引用與參考文本進行比對?雖然有檢查清單可以比較不同譯本中的腳註、章節標題、引用等項目,但我找不到任何方法可以對交叉引用(由 \x 標記集標記)進行相同的操作。這可能嗎? anon380150
anon380150 242 提出 已提問 10月 3, 2022
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
They devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and to fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer.
Acts 2:42
3,048 個問題
6,007 個回答
5,672 則評論
2,028 位使用者