0 votes
533 views

Our team would like to add cross references which refer to the same book without stating the book name.

E.g. inside the book of Matthew, to have a footnote saying something like "for more information on this topic also see \xt 2:34\xt* "

I can’t get this to work and still pass the reference checks. Of course we could simply leave those as unmarked (no \xt marker), but then we would lose the ability to quickly check if the reference is the correct one, and we would lose the ability to hot-link the references in future digital publications.

Is there any way to set up the Scripture Reference Settings so that a reference with no book name means “the current book”?

Paratext by (1.9k points)
reshown | 533 views

1 Answer

0 votes
Best answer

It should work to just have the chapter and verse referring to the current book. I just tried it in a test project and it works fine for me.
What is the error message you are getting?

by [Expert]
(16.7k points)

anon848905, thanks for the hack which looks like it might fit our purposes to some extent, though they obviously wouldn’t let us click the link and check the attached passage.

anon291708, in your test project did you just have a reference like \xt 2:34\xt*? I know you can type out the book name if it’s self-referential, but we’re trying to have xrefs that don’t include a book name at all.

Yes, I tried it directly in the text and in a cross reference. See 1KI 10:26 in my screenshot (I know this is 9.0, but it should act the same in 8.0):

That’s why I was wondering what error message you got. Maybe the error message is unrelated to not having a book specified.

Arrrgh. You’re completely right.

The problem was the reference was typed in our old format, and so was failing the test. So if you just have chapter:verse (formatted correctly :smile:) and no book name, it works exactly the way I had hoped.

Yes, I have seen several projects with cross-references internal to books and was wondering what has “broken” to keep this from working. I do know of one project that used the book name “Kap” for all cross references in the same book, but they could not pass the Scripture reference checks either.

By the way, the \ior…\ior* and \xt…\xt* markers are routinely used in book introductions and pass the Scripture reference checks. If this ever stops work, please report the bug.

And that is why anon291708 is so valuable! He knows things - and asks good questions. Thanks anon291708! I will retract my previous suggestion so as not to confuse the issue.

Related questions

+1 vote
1 answer 252 views
Apologies if this has already been asked/discussed or is in a manual somewhere! I'm wondering if there is a way ... for references, but these were not picked up. Thanks, anon953007
anon953007 213 asked Jan 25, 2021
0 votes
1 answer 33 views
There are numerous places where we have used \+nd Here\+nd* in cross reference keywords/quotes or in footnote ... correct way to style these in cross-references and footnotes?
gregbac 141 asked Jan 19
0 votes
1 answer 97 views
Since the is detail lacking in the USFM documentation and I am not able to find the answer here, please can you clarify the ... -->|ESG 10:13\xta \+it k\+it*\x*
gregbac 141 asked Jan 9
0 votes
1 answer 230 views
In one of our projects, we inserted footnotes using the insert cross reference tool in Paratext after everything was drafted and ... move the cross refs to the end of the verse?
anon251522 150 asked Jun 7, 2023
0 votes
1 answer 328 views
Is there a way to check cross-references against a reference text? There are checklists to compare footnotes, section headings ... \x set of markers). Is it possible? anon380150
anon380150 242 asked Oct 3, 2022
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
Accept the one whose faith is weak, without quarreling over disputable matters.
Romans 14:1
3,048 questions
6,007 answers
5,672 comments
2,028 users