+1 票
543 次瀏覽

We want to spell check just the current book. So we chose Checking > Spell check current book. It correctly shows just the references for the current book. However, when we make corrections it goes through all the verses in the project, but we only want to correct the current book - we don’t have time to clean up the rest of the books. I also tried use the spellcheck from the text (using the red squiggle lines) and it also wants to correct all the books in the project.

Is this a bug or are we doing something wrong?

Thanks
anon703820

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
Paratext 由 (222 點) 提出 | 543 次瀏覽

2 個回答

0 票
最佳回答

It’s not a bug and you aren’t doing anything wrong. That’s just the way the spelling corrections were designed to work. Paratext assumes that if something is spelled a certain way and you mark it as incorrect, that you should fix it everywhere.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
由 [Expert]
(16.7k 點) 提出

Well, it is true that it should eventually be fixed, but when faced with a very messy text and a deadline, it is very common to fix just the current book for now.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示

anon703820,

The behaviour you describe is how spell checked as worked for a long time.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示

One ugly, but quick work-around would be to temporarily remove the other books from the project (Close Paratext and move the books to a holding folder) and spell check the current book. Then you could put the books back. This is not the optimal solution, but if you are under a deadline it could save you time.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示

anon703820,

If you turn off editing permission for the books you wish to ignore and set the range in the wordlist tool, the wordlist will show you only the instances in the books you want and when you correct a word, you will only be asked to correct the words in the books you have permission for. I have not checked out project plan assignment behavior in this regard but I would hope it would behave the same.

I think there may still be a slight problem with the spell-checker considering outside range instances and not clean when capitalization, for example, is incorrect in an out of range book. It hasn’t happened to me clearly enough for a report yet.

Shegnada

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
0 票

No matter how you do this process of either turning off permissions (good idea, but more complicated if permissions were set in Assignments and Progress), or temporarily removing books. Please make sure that the team is aware of what is being done and that people don’t get confused by a S/R that suddenly has different permissions or empty books.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
由 [Expert]
(9.9k 點) 提出

相關問題

0 票
2 個回答 598 次瀏覽
Is it possible to constrain the Spellcheck tool to the current book? When we get a new typed first draft, one of the ... a lot of work that has already been done in other books.
Paul 642 提出 已提問 4月 8, 2016
0 票
0 個回答 195 次瀏覽
各位好, 在 lingtrans 的 Paratext-FLEx 整合教學 LingTranSoft Wiki | Paratext-FLEx 整合教學 中,列出了 PT 與 Flex 連結的許多功能和優勢 然而,最明顯的功能 ... 地語言 Flex 拼字檢查?這將是兩者之間極佳的交叉授粉(cross fertilisation)方式 goodgoan.
goodgoan 347 提出 已提問 9月 14, 2022
0 票
1 個回答 274 次瀏覽
我們正在起草次經(Deuterocanonical books) 以斯拉記(Esther)的希臘文版本學習曲線較陡 對於替代節(alternate verses),我們遵循 RSV 版本 因此,以斯拉記希臘文第 4 章第 18 節的開頭如下: \cp 13 \p ... 編號標記 在使用 \vp \vp* 標記的同時,有辦法讓文字進行拼字檢查嗎? 謝謝!
anon827984 130 提出 已提問 2月 15, 2022
0 票
1 個回答 218 次瀏覽
I have the main vernacular project in a special script and also a Romanized version using transliteration. When trying to do ... you want to do spell checking on the primary text?
anon650332 163 提出 已提問 12月 31, 2018
0 票
3 個回答 423 次瀏覽
擁有附錄書卷(例如 XXD)權限的使用者,無法使用右鍵選單中的「Correct Spelling」選項來修正拼錯的字;系統會顯示訊息表示找不到任何出現的實例(儘管確實有一個)。然而,該拼錯的字仍被標記為「incorrect」。我們做錯了什麼嗎?
drwww 448 提出 已提問 9月 17, 2020
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Galatians 3:28
3,060 個問題
6,021 個回答
5,689 則評論
2,035 位使用者