+1 票
543 次浏览

We want to spell check just the current book. So we chose Checking > Spell check current book. It correctly shows just the references for the current book. However, when we make corrections it goes through all the verses in the project, but we only want to correct the current book - we don’t have time to clean up the rest of the books. I also tried use the spellcheck from the text (using the red squiggle lines) and it also wants to correct all the books in the project.

Is this a bug or are we doing something wrong?

Thanks
anon703820

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
Paratext 中 由 (222 分) 发布 | 543 次浏览

2 个回答

0 票
最佳答案

It’s not a bug and you aren’t doing anything wrong. That’s just the way the spelling corrections were designed to work. Paratext assumes that if something is spelled a certain way and you mark it as incorrect, that you should fix it everywhere.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
由 [Expert]
(16.7k 分) 发布

Well, it is true that it should eventually be fixed, but when faced with a very messy text and a deadline, it is very common to fix just the current book for now.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示

anon703820,

The behaviour you describe is how spell checked as worked for a long time.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示

One ugly, but quick work-around would be to temporarily remove the other books from the project (Close Paratext and move the books to a holding folder) and spell check the current book. Then you could put the books back. This is not the optimal solution, but if you are under a deadline it could save you time.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示

anon703820,

If you turn off editing permission for the books you wish to ignore and set the range in the wordlist tool, the wordlist will show you only the instances in the books you want and when you correct a word, you will only be asked to correct the words in the books you have permission for. I have not checked out project plan assignment behavior in this regard but I would hope it would behave the same.

I think there may still be a slight problem with the spell-checker considering outside range instances and not clean when capitalization, for example, is incorrect in an out of range book. It hasn’t happened to me clearly enough for a report yet.

Shegnada

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
0 票

No matter how you do this process of either turning off permissions (good idea, but more complicated if permissions were set in Assignments and Progress), or temporarily removing books. Please make sure that the team is aware of what is being done and that people don’t get confused by a S/R that suddenly has different permissions or empty books.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
由 [Expert]
(9.9k 分) 发布

相关问题

0 票
2 个回答 598 次浏览
Is it possible to constrain the Spellcheck tool to the current book? When we get a new typed first draft, one of the ... a lot of work that has already been done in other books.
Paul 642 发布 提问于 四月 8, 2016
0 票
0 个回答 195 次浏览
大家好, 在 lingtrans 的 Paratext-FLEx 集成教程 LingTranSoft Wiki | Paratext-FLEx 集成教程 中,列出了 PT 与 Flex 之间链接的许多功能和优势 然而,最明显的一项功能--拼写检查 ... 来填充这个内部本地语言 Flex 拼写检查?那将是两者之间很好的交叉融合方式 goodgoan.
goodgoan 347 发布 提问于 九月 14, 2022
0 票
1 个回答 274 次浏览
我们正在起草次经(Deuterocanonical books) 希腊文《以斯帖记》的学习曲线较陡 对于替代经文,我们遵循 RSV 译本 因此,希腊文《以斯帖记》第 4 章第 18 节开头如下: \cp 13 \p \v 18 \vp8\vp* [然 ... 使用替代经文编号标记 在使用 \vp \vp* 标记的同时,有没有办法对文本进行拼写检查? 谢谢!
anon827984 130 发布 提问于 二月 15, 2022
0 票
1 个回答 218 次浏览
I have the main vernacular project in a special script and also a Romanized version using transliteration. When trying to do ... you want to do spell checking on the primary text?
anon650332 163 发布 提问于 十二月 31, 2018
0 票
3 个回答 423 次浏览
拥有次经(例如 XXD)权限的用户无法使用右键菜单中的“Correct Spelling”(更正拼写)选项来更正拼写错误的单词,系统会显示一条消息,称未找到任何匹配项(尽管实际上存在一个)。然而,该拼写错误仍被标记为“incorrect”(不正确)。我们做错了什么?
drwww 448 发布 提问于 九月 17, 2020
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin.
1 John 1:7
3,060 个问题
6,021 个回答
5,689 条评论
2,035 位用户