0 votos
362 visualizações

One user wants to use print draft but is encountering an error which says “marker errors detected”, when certain chapters of the book in question are chosen. The error message suggests to the run basic checks / markers but this returns no errors.

I have tested with several different books, and in each case, if chapter 1 to chapter 1 is chosen in print draft, then there is no error message. If any other combination of chapters is chosen (e.g. chapter 1 to chapter 2, or chapter 2 to chapter 2) then the error message is seen.

Is this a known issue? Is there actually a marker missing from chapters after chapter 1? Is print draft running a different check to basic checks / markers? Should the user be concerned about the message seen in print draft?

Publicação antiga - exibida no idioma original
Paratext por (135 pontos) | 362 visualizações

2 Respostas

0 votos
Melhor resposta

Yes, the “marker errors detected” message that PrintDraft gives appears to be somewhat unconnected with the markers checking tool. I think the word “marker” in the PrintDraft warning is probably a mistake, and that you’re actually failing one of the other basic checks.

In practice I ignore that PrintDraft message. If the pdf compiles successfully, I’m happy. If it doesn’t, I start running through the basic checks trying to fix the problem.

Note that sometimes the PrintDraft appears to complete, but if you check carefully you’ll find that the Scripture range is truncated somewhere in the middle. Don’t assume everything is perfect just because you ended up with a pdf.

Remember that you can hold Control while clicking the OK button in the PrintDraft menu. This will allow you to look in the PrintDraft folder and read the .log file to discover what is going wrong.

Publicação antiga - exibida no idioma original
por (1,9k pontos)
0 votos

Thanks. Apparently it is a known issue. To be fixed in a version after 8.0.100.56.

Publicação antiga - exibida no idioma original
por (135 pontos)

I still get the message ‘Marker errors detected’ in version 8.0.100.71 without finding any marker errors with the PT basic checks.

Publicação antiga - exibida no idioma original

Yes, it i still an issue. You should be able to safely ignore the message (if you have run the check), but I have reported the issue to the developers.

Blessings,
anon848905

Publicação antiga - exibida no idioma original

Perguntas relacionadas

0 votos
3 respostas 1,2k visualizações
Alguém pode me dizer o que preciso fazer para eliminar esses erros exibidos pelas verificações básicas (basic checks)? Para um ... posso informar ao PT que isso não é um erro?
skim1124 219 perguntada Mai 4, 2021
0 votos
1 resposta 297 visualizações
In our project, we have, I believe, three active projects* that are all for the national language. Clearly, they ... has its own project, then see Separate project for publishing?
wdavidhj 1,4k perguntada Nov 7, 2017
+1 voto
1 resposta 279 visualizações
Quero exportar um projeto em japonês que contém texto ruby para RTF (Print Draft também está bem, se necessário). ... o projeto está configurado para USFM 3. Obrigado pela ajuda.
anon180868 195 perguntada Dez 28, 2020
0 votos
4 respostas 601 visualizações
Tildes (used in USFMs as non-breaking spaces) disappear when the view is changed in Preview view, as expected. ... . Am I missing some step that would make these disappear?
Alex W. 191 perguntada Jul 13, 2018
0 votos
0 respostas 193 visualizações
While I have submitted a problem report, it does not include one of the screen shots, so I thought someone ... Roman (but trying different fonts changed nothing.) Iver+Larsen
Iver Larsen 869 perguntada Abr 9, 2018
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
Finally, all of you, be like-minded, be sympathetic, love one another, be compassionate and humble.
1 Peter 3:8
3,049 perguntas
6,007 respostas
5,672 comentários
2,029 usuários