0 votes
512 vues

I have (cross reference) notes with more than one “origin reference” \xo, one referring to one verse, another referring to a range of verses. Here is an example:

\x * \xo 7.16‑17 \xt Mt 12.33, 35 \xo 7.16 \xq ἀπὸ … αὐτούς \xt Sir 27.6 \xq μήτι … σῦκα \xt Jas 3.12\x*

With basic checks I now get the following error:

MAT 7:16 Missing or invalid punctuation before \xo: Mt 12.33, 35

Is there a place in the Scripture reference settings to get rid of these errors?

The USFM documentation does not mention more than one \xo (allowing or forbidding). Splitting the references up into two notes would be possible, but I find it not very elegant to have two reference notes directly one after another.

Ancienne publication - affichée dans sa langue d'origine
Paratext par (872 points) | 512 vues

1 Réponse

0 votes
Meilleure réponse

For multiple \xo markers to appear in a single cross reference, they must be separated by a major reference divider (i.e. either a Book Sequence separator or Chapter Sequence separator), or by Final Punctuation if Final punctuation must end each \xt section in all cross references is checked in the Scripture Reference Settings.

So the following should work (note the semicolon before the second \xo):

\x * \xo 7.16‑17 \xt Mt 12.33, 35; \xo 7.16 \xq ἀπὸ … αὐτούς \xt Sir 27.6 \xq μήτι … σῦκα \xt Jas 3.1`2\x*

Ancienne publication - affichée dans sa langue d'origine
par [Expert]
(16,7k points)

réaffiché

Questions connexes

0 votes
2 réponses 642 vues
I hope that title was descriptive enough. Our project has a few keywords that contain USFM markers for example \w \+nd God\ ... markup so that it can find them in the GLO? Thanks!
anon469793 155 posée nov. 13, 2019
+2 votes
1 réponse 30 vues
Chère équipe de développement de Paratext, Je souhaite signaler un problème lié à Run Basic Checks (Vérifications de ... ? Merci beaucoup pour votre soutien. Cordialement, Prabhu
Prabhu_beelagi 241 posée mars 25
0 votes
3 réponses 520 vues
It used to be the case that the xo marker was optional in cross references, but now PT 8.0.100 Basic Checks References ... there a way to tell PT not to demand the xo marker?
Seppo Sipilä 250 posée sept. 20, 2018
+1 vote
1 réponse 80 vues
Bonjour, Merci aux développeurs de PT pour tout votre travail remarquable ! Je suis linguiste, facilitateur de ... simplement partager ce retour d'information. Merci beaucoup !
alex_larkin 379 posée juil. 21
0 votes
1 réponse 27 vues
J'ai remarqué que de nombreuses erreurs d'espacement, telles que ||[U+0020]||, apparaissent lors des ... rejeter chacune d'elles individuellement ? Merci pour votre aide.
Shivaji 117 posée mars 19
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
Don’t you know that you yourselves are God’s temple and that God’s Spirit dwells in your midst?
1 Corinthians 3:16
3,052 questions
6,011 réponses
5,677 commentaires
2,032 utilisateurs