0
343 次浏览

I have a colleague who is being frustrated with the English interlinearizing of the Greet NT source text in Paratext 8. She sites several differences from the Paratext 7 glosses and feels that the choices for word glosses are interpretive (and at times not at all the interpretation she would choose!). She is wondering if it is possible to access the English glosses from the Paratext 7 version?

Some examples she gives are:
Rev. 1:1 the Greek verb didomi is glossed as “appoint” rather than "give."
Rev 1:3 the Greek word kairos is glossed as “end-time” rather than simply "time."
Romans 1.1 the Greek noun euangelion is glossed as “cause.of.the.gospel” rather than simply "gospel."
Romans 1.3 sarx is “mortal nature” rather than "flesh."
Romans 1.5 pistis is “doctrine” rather than “faith” which is not an interpretation in the English and French translations . . .

Since the resources are in different formats in Paratext 7 and 8, they are not directly interchangeable, but if we could get a copy of the glosses as a Paratext project then it could be added as an alternative gloss (even though that would mean losing the French gloss). But then I don’t know what, if any, implications that may have on copyright restrictions. But I thought it was worth asking.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
Paratext (222 分) 发布 | 343 次浏览

2 个回答

0
最佳答案

Issues around meanings and the number of senses each source language word has are common because there are many opinions on how these should be handled. I suppose that is why Paratext has several Greek lexicons for example. Should we request a new feature that the glosses in the Source Language Tool be editable?

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
[Expert]
(2.9k 分) 发布

I agree, going with BART is much more helpful. The one thing (or two) PT has up on BART is the special dictionaries for Human made things and Animals and Plants, the dictionary for the LXX and the OT semantic domains dictionary. And in BART you can add your own notes, if you don’t like something or as a reminder…

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
0

If you are able to use BART or AGNT in Translator’s Workplace you will get
much better glosses. BART is most helpful because of the powerful search
tools.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
(869 分) 发布
已重新显示

相关问题

0
2 个回答 592 次浏览
The instructions for 7.6β say: You must ensure that the other members of the project team have upgraded Paratext before ... for sure that they really were on the latest version.
wdavidhj 1.4k 发布 提问于 六月 18, 2015
0
0 个回答 167 次浏览
The national translators often enter a gloss, then change their mind about the spelling or about the gloss in general. We ... in the word list, can be eliminated. Is that possible?
anon084052 157 发布 提问于 二月 10, 2018
0
3 个回答 422 次浏览
Paratext 9.2 增加了一种新的源语文本资源:OHEB/OGRK(即《开放圣经希伯来文旧约》和 UBS 希腊文新约第四版)。我推测 UBS 新约第四版是供那些不想使用 UBS 5(NA28)的译员使用的,但 OHEB 提供了 BHS/UBS5 源语文本尚未提供的什么内容吗?词形分析不同吗?释义不同吗?有什么理由要切换吗?
viverechristus 296 发布 提问于 十二月 23, 2021
0
2 个回答 331 次浏览
我正在排版一个逐词对照(Interlinear)项目 一切都正常,但有一节经文没有正确渲染(见下方截图) 此外,我想更改 gloss|rb 的颜色,当 ... editMarker UnboundLocalError: local variable 'site' referenced before assignment PTXprint 版本 2.4.16
Sajid Imdad 110 发布 提问于 三月 12, 2024
0
3 个回答 363 次浏览
I am currently involved with a project which is working on an LWC interlinear as a source text for other ... Source</TranslationInfo> <ResourceText>T</ResourceText> Thanks, mnjames
mnjames 1.9k 发布 提问于 八月 11, 2015
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
Give proper recognition to those widows who are really in need.
1 Timothy 5:3
3,045 个问题
6,005 个回答
5,671 条评论
2,026 位用户