0 suara
341 tampilan

I have a colleague who is being frustrated with the English interlinearizing of the Greet NT source text in Paratext 8. She sites several differences from the Paratext 7 glosses and feels that the choices for word glosses are interpretive (and at times not at all the interpretation she would choose!). She is wondering if it is possible to access the English glosses from the Paratext 7 version?

Some examples she gives are:
Rev. 1:1 the Greek verb didomi is glossed as “appoint” rather than "give."
Rev 1:3 the Greek word kairos is glossed as “end-time” rather than simply "time."
Romans 1.1 the Greek noun euangelion is glossed as “cause.of.the.gospel” rather than simply "gospel."
Romans 1.3 sarx is “mortal nature” rather than "flesh."
Romans 1.5 pistis is “doctrine” rather than “faith” which is not an interpretation in the English and French translations . . .

Since the resources are in different formats in Paratext 7 and 8, they are not directly interchangeable, but if we could get a copy of the glosses as a Paratext project then it could be added as an alternative gloss (even though that would mean losing the French gloss). But then I don’t know what, if any, implications that may have on copyright restrictions. But I thought it was worth asking.

Postingan lama - ditampilkan dalam bahasa aslinya
Paratext oleh (222 poin) | 341 tampilan

2 Jawaban

0 suara
Jawaban terbaik

Issues around meanings and the number of senses each source language word has are common because there are many opinions on how these should be handled. I suppose that is why Paratext has several Greek lexicons for example. Should we request a new feature that the glosses in the Source Language Tool be editable?

Postingan lama - ditampilkan dalam bahasa aslinya
oleh [Expert]
(2,9k poin)

I agree, going with BART is much more helpful. The one thing (or two) PT has up on BART is the special dictionaries for Human made things and Animals and Plants, the dictionary for the LXX and the OT semantic domains dictionary. And in BART you can add your own notes, if you don’t like something or as a reminder…

Postingan lama - ditampilkan dalam bahasa aslinya
0 suara

If you are able to use BART or AGNT in Translator’s Workplace you will get
much better glosses. BART is most helpful because of the powerful search
tools.

Postingan lama - ditampilkan dalam bahasa aslinya
oleh (869 poin)
ditampilkan kembali

Pertanyaan terkait

0 suara
2 jawaban 592 tampilan
The instructions for 7.6β say: You must ensure that the other members of the project team have upgraded Paratext before ... for sure that they really were on the latest version.
wdavidhj 1,4k bertanya Jun 18, 2015
0 suara
0 jawaban 167 tampilan
The national translators often enter a gloss, then change their mind about the spelling or about the gloss in general. We ... in the word list, can be eliminated. Is that possible?
anon084052 157 bertanya Feb 10, 2018
0 suara
3 jawaban 422 tampilan
Paratext 9.2 menambahkan sumber Teks Bahasa Sumber baru: OHEB/OGRK (Perjanjian Lama Ibrani Open Scriptures dan Edisi ... berbeda? Glosanya berbeda? Apakah ada alasan untuk beralih?
viverechristus 296 bertanya Des 23, 2021
0 suara
2 jawaban 331 tampilan
Saya sedang melakukan typesetting proyek Interlinear. Semuanya baik-baik saja, tetapi satu ayat tidak dirender dengan ... ' referenced before assignment PTXprint Version 2.4.16
Sajid Imdad 110 bertanya Mar 12, 2024
0 suara
3 jawaban 363 tampilan
I am currently involved with a project which is working on an LWC interlinear as a source text for other ... Source</TranslationInfo> <ResourceText>T</ResourceText> Thanks, mnjames
mnjames 1,9k bertanya Agu 11, 2015
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Galatians 3:28
3,045 pertanyaan
6,005 jawaban
5,671 komentar
2,026 pengguna