0 votos
342 vistas

I have a colleague who is being frustrated with the English interlinearizing of the Greet NT source text in Paratext 8. She sites several differences from the Paratext 7 glosses and feels that the choices for word glosses are interpretive (and at times not at all the interpretation she would choose!). She is wondering if it is possible to access the English glosses from the Paratext 7 version?

Some examples she gives are:
Rev. 1:1 the Greek verb didomi is glossed as “appoint” rather than "give."
Rev 1:3 the Greek word kairos is glossed as “end-time” rather than simply "time."
Romans 1.1 the Greek noun euangelion is glossed as “cause.of.the.gospel” rather than simply "gospel."
Romans 1.3 sarx is “mortal nature” rather than "flesh."
Romans 1.5 pistis is “doctrine” rather than “faith” which is not an interpretation in the English and French translations . . .

Since the resources are in different formats in Paratext 7 and 8, they are not directly interchangeable, but if we could get a copy of the glosses as a Paratext project then it could be added as an alternative gloss (even though that would mean losing the French gloss). But then I don’t know what, if any, implications that may have on copyright restrictions. But I thought it was worth asking.

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
Paratext por (222 puntos) | 342 vistas

2 Respuestas

0 votos
Mejor respuesta

Issues around meanings and the number of senses each source language word has are common because there are many opinions on how these should be handled. I suppose that is why Paratext has several Greek lexicons for example. Should we request a new feature that the glosses in the Source Language Tool be editable?

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
por [Expert]
(2,9k puntos)

I agree, going with BART is much more helpful. The one thing (or two) PT has up on BART is the special dictionaries for Human made things and Animals and Plants, the dictionary for the LXX and the OT semantic domains dictionary. And in BART you can add your own notes, if you don’t like something or as a reminder…

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
0 votos

If you are able to use BART or AGNT in Translator’s Workplace you will get
much better glosses. BART is most helpful because of the powerful search
tools.

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
por (869 puntos)
mostrada de nuevo

Preguntas relacionadas

0 votos
2 respuestas 592 vistas
The instructions for 7.6β say: You must ensure that the other members of the project team have upgraded Paratext before ... for sure that they really were on the latest version.
wdavidhj 1,4k preguntada jun 18, 2015
0 votos
0 respuestas 167 vistas
The national translators often enter a gloss, then change their mind about the spelling or about the gloss in general. We ... in the word list, can be eliminated. Is that possible?
anon084052 157 preguntada feb 10, 2018
0 votos
3 respuestas 422 vistas
Paratext 9.2 añade un nuevo recurso de Texto en Lengua Original: OHEB/OGRK (el Antiguo Testamento hebreo de Open ... Los glosas son diferentes? Hay alguna razón para cambiar?
viverechristus 296 preguntada dic 23, 2021
0 votos
2 respuestas 331 vistas
Estoy componiendo un proyecto interlineal. Todo está bien, pero un versículo no se renderiza correctamente (vea la ... 'site' referenced before assignment PTXprint Version 2.4.16
Sajid Imdad 110 preguntada mar 12, 2024
0 votos
3 respuestas 363 vistas
I am currently involved with a project which is working on an LWC interlinear as a source text for other ... Source</TranslationInfo> <ResourceText>T</ResourceText> Thanks, mnjames
mnjames 1,9k preguntada ago 11, 2015
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
So Peter was kept in prison, but the church was earnestly praying to God for him.
Acts 12:5
3,045 preguntas
6,005 respuestas
5,671 comentarios
2,026 usuarios