0 votes
360 views

Hello,
I would like to know if it is possible to have more than one Glossary lists or how to accommodate two separate Glossaries in PT. I have two separate lists (or Glossaries) that I don’t want to mix because they give explanations of different kinds. PT has only one book for Glossary (GLO) as Peripheral. So, I want to know how to include my List #2 in PT, but functioning just like List #1 (Glossary). I tried creating Extra book (XXA) and Name Index (NDX), but both don’t work. For XXA, for the entry I wanted to enter \xxa_…\xxa*, but it is not recognized as valid. For NDX, \ndx_…\ndx* is valid, but the link does not work.

Any help is appreciated.
Bayar

Paratext by (122 points) | 360 views

1 Answer

0 votes
Best answer

I also would very much like help with this issue. I work on a project where the team wants to include a ‘glossary’ for regional variations in their language and also a normal glossary with terms like Ferisi. The first will be in the front of the publication and the other in the back.

by (148 points)

You can only have one book called “GLO”, but you have several other books (XXA-XXG) that can be used for producing other materials. You could put a second set of glossary files in one of those books.

Thanks anon848905,

So if I create a second book, do I use the same \w markers for both sets? How will Paratext know what the link is pointing to?

anon310509

You will not be able to link to the second book. The linking works with GLO.

Okay anon848905,

Thanks so much. Because we want the links, I think we will keep everything in GLO up to the point it goes to DBL. Having two separate books is not necessary for App and DBL, I assume.

However, we will need to split the GLO book into two for print publications. I may have our colleague do that in publishing assistant, instead of creating a ‘for print’ version in Paratext. Is that what you would recommend?

anon310509

Yes, you could do this at print time. You would want to make sure you use some kind of marker to distinguish the different terms. Not sure the best suggestion.

Related questions

0 votes
0 answers 172 views
Paratext can only automatically sort glossary entries that are properly linked in the Biblical terms tool. Changing the ... have changed and are no longer being sorted correctly.
[Expert]
Jeff_Shrum
2.9k
asked Mar 23, 2021
0 votes
1 answer 254 views
I need to mark up a passage with glossary terms using \wj \wj* Words of Jesus (red letter) markup. I am ... am wondering if anyone knows what is best practice in this situation.
Kent Spielmann 1.8k asked Feb 7, 2018
0 votes
1 answer 86 views
In the PTXprint output for Glossary, the the book name for the glossary does not show up in the header. The Paratext file ... the book name for Glossary to show up in the header?
Iska 164 asked Mar 12, 2025
+2 votes
4 answers 248 views
The Komba translation team postponed a error under quotations at the end of stage one and the same error recurred then in ... 3. Is this a bug or am I misunderstanding something?
anon142050 118 asked Apr 17, 2019
0 votes
1 answer 475 views
I have (cross reference) notes with more than one origin reference \xo, one referring to one verse, another ... elegant to have two reference notes directly one after another.
lichti 872 asked Apr 23, 2018
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
Every day they continued to meet together in the temple courts. They broke bread in their homes and ate together with glad and sincere hearts, praising God and enjoying the favor of all the people. And the Lord added to their number daily those who were being saved.
Acts 2:46-47
3,037 questions
5,995 answers
5,662 comments
2,022 users