0 票
393 次瀏覽

Currently, the work done in the Paratext Project Interlinearizer cannot be imported into Fieldworks directly, and even then only partially. The Project Interlinearizer can be use to make a highly literal back translation and that output can be exported to back translation project in Paratext and Fieldworks will bring that back translation in as a free translation when the Scripture is imported into Fieldworks. The limitation being that there must be a high level of conformity in the USFMs in both the vernacular and back translation projects, or Fieldworks can not match the back translation to the vernacular correctly.

It is true that Paratext can generate a “FlexText” version of the data from the Project Interlinearizer, but this feature is not able to transfer the parsing or the word glossing from the Paratext Project Interlinearizer to the Intelinear view of FLEx. Parsing or even word glossing between Paratext and Fieldworks are not compatible. As I understand it work on making a conversion process through “FlexText” has been discontinued in favor of integrating Paratext and Fieldworks to the point that both programs use the same databases. So for now, the analyst or translator has to decide if they wish to interlinearize in Paratext or Fieldworks.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
Paratext 由 [Expert]
(2.9k 點) 提出

已重新顯示 | 393 次瀏覽

2 個回答

0 票

I guess you could import the lexicon.xml file as a word/gloss list too and that might help. Perhaps if anyone is interested in doing this let me know here and that might encourage me to try it out. Having often publicly encouraged translators and consultants to build dictionaries and then lean on them while translating, I’m trying to do as I say.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
由 (510 點) 提出
0 票

Any update on this or are we will kind of stuck choosing?

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
由 (184 點) 提出

相關問題

0 票
4 個回答 839 次瀏覽
Continuing the discussion from Importing Back Translation along with Vernacular into Fieldworks: Importing Back Translation ... translation but obviously that didn't work either.
jbabt 115 提出 已提問 1月 9, 2017
0 票
0 個回答 252 次瀏覽
When importing Scripture from Paratext into Fieldworks, It is possible to have the back translation import along with the ... Paratext has to be linked to the vernacular project.
[Expert]
Jeff_Shrum
2.9k 提出
已提問 12月 2, 2016
0 票
2 個回答 396 次瀏覽
是否有可能將 FLEx 中的逐字對照文本匯入 PT9? 謝謝
listentwice 1.2k 提出 已提問 4月 8, 2022
0 票
2 個回答 403 次瀏覽
When you make corrections to \toc headers, the Book Names under Scripture Reference Settings don’t seem to update automatically. Is that by design?
匿名 提出 已提問 4月 10, 2015
0 票
2 個回答 455 次瀏覽
@pafederwitz 和我有一位同事,他需要將他在 Adapt It 中建立的逐字對照(interlinearized)資料匯入 Paratext 他使用 Adapt It 已經很多年了,裡面有很多詞法分析(parsing)資料,他不想失去 ... 開發人員或在 Adapt It 論壇上提出,我很樂意被指引到正確的方向 anon766047 Veith
anon766047 152 提出 已提問 2月 9, 2021
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
Finally, all of you, be like-minded, be sympathetic, love one another, be compassionate and humble.
1 Peter 3:8
3,060 個問題
6,021 個回答
5,689 則評論
2,035 位使用者