2016-07-28 20:44，我在主题为“从 Paratext 在线存储库恢复文本？”的帖子中写给 PT Supporters ：
因此，您可以使用 Compare Texts （比较文本）来查看文本在项目历史中任何特定时间点的状态。但是，要对文本的先前版本执行其他操作（例如：）则比较困难：
Print（打印）
Print Draft（打印草稿）
Save as RTF（另存为 RTF）
Export to Pathway（导出到 Pathway）
您可以恢复到想要的时间点，然后在导出/保存后恢复回当前版本，但这会在项目历史中造成混乱——我在上述同一帖子中评论道：
尽管如此，我认为我见过其他人推荐“双重恢复”作为处理项目先前版本的方法。
但就我个人而言，我希望有一种简单的方法，能够对先前版本执行所有可以在当前文本上执行的操作。这值得作为一个功能请求吗？
On 2016-07-28 20:44, I wrote to PT Supporters under subject “Recover text from Paratext online repository?”:
If I were looking for chapters in previous points in the Project History, I wouldn’t restore to each point. Instead I’d use the Compare Texts… feature, which allows you to view any point in the history.
So, you can use Compare Texts to view the text as it was at any particular point in the Project History. But it’s harder to do other things with a previous version of the texts, such as:
Print
Print Draft
Save as RTF
Export to Pathway
You could restore to the point you want, and then restore back to the current version after exporting/saving, but that creates a mess in the Project History – I commented in the same posting as above:
If you want to view a previous point by restoring to that point, you’re then likely to undo that restore. That’s two more points in the history, and if you do it repeatedly, you end up with a very complex history!
Despite that, I think I have seen others recommend the “double-restore” as a way to work with a previous version of a project.
But personally, I wish there was an easy way to do all operations that you are able to do on the current text, on a previous version. Worth a Feature Request?
机器翻译自 English 显示原文
