+1 vote
268 views
Currently, \rem tags in Paratext projects are not stripped when uploaded to DBL. Private information was being stored in \rem tags for one project, and this information was not stripped out.

If \rem tags were always stripped out when uploading content to DBL, would that cause problems? Is there a checklist for people in sensitive locations to use before they upload to DBL?

Jonathan+Robie
Paratext by (448 points)
reshown | 268 views

2 Answers

+1 vote
Best answer

Always stripping out \rem tags risks losing potentially important information for translators and typesetters. However, I always strip them out on eBible.org for security reasons on any format that I post publicly.

by (241 points)

I am surprised that this would be considered. I totally support anon854042’s comment on important information being lost. This may be true with comments for Bible text but if you look at the extra biblical material for any project there will (or should) be important/critical comments for transitioning the project to a product.

I am attaching a couple of GNT examples. Obviously the blue text shows the comments.

remarks in GNT front matter book

rem_FRT

rem_FRT988×1491 127 KB

remarks in GNT INT

rem_INT

rem_INT865×1191 189 KB

remark count for GNT in non-biblical books == 117

rem_count

rem_count411×593 49.9 KB

I could have or should have added… initially with Paratext 8 extra biblical material was not included with resource delivery in Paratext – that was a problem because projects had no model to follow when working on their extra biblical material. Having extra biblical material from models like the GNT (or any other resource) has given everyone a view into what it takes to transition a project to an actual product.

I imagine that any typesetter would confirm that inconsistency (or lack of clarity) of the extra biblical content coming their way is one of their biggest challenges.

0 votes

Thanks, these examples are helpful. It’s pretty clear that we can’t just strip \rem tags.

I think the archivists just need to be aware to check for confidential information in \rem tags when uploading sensitive projects to DBL.

by (448 points)

Related questions

0 votes
2 answers 312 views
I'm helping a team that work on a project that uses Latin script. As they do the Biblical Terms check, the tool ignores case ... the word Lord' when one look for the word lord'?
benVar 229 asked Feb 8, 2018
0 votes
2 answers 308 views
I'm just learning my way around PT8, so this might be a silly question, but: Is the USFM code \rem valid in PT8? If yes, ... I have is v. 2.4. Has that been superseded in PT8?]
Paul 642 asked Nov 17, 2018
0 votes
3 answers 228 views
I did not mark this post as a question . It might be a bug-report, unless I will find out that we did something ... , so it matters that they can filter and know what is what.
Tim 934 asked Mar 3, 2023
0 votes
1 answer 153 views
Hi, I was wondering if there is a straightforward way to import a set of note tags into a project? For ... if there would be negative ramifications to doing this. Thanks BEH
BEH 418 asked Jun 28, 2018
+1 vote
2 answers 287 views
A few days ago, I painfully found out that the tag nonpublishable inside a project usfm.sty is important and ... about PT8 and about using its features correctly and properly.
Tim 934 asked Feb 1, 2019
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
Every day they continued to meet together in the temple courts. They broke bread in their homes and ate together with glad and sincere hearts, praising God and enjoying the favor of all the people. And the Lord added to their number daily those who were being saved.
Acts 2:46-47
3,038 questions
5,994 answers
5,661 comments
2,022 users