+1 票
275 次瀏覽

There appear to be two obstacles to using the interlinearizer to create a Back Translation of the Glossary.

(1) The Glossary doesn’t have verse numbers. However, verse numbers can be temporarily added for breaking up the text for purposes of interlinearization, then removed.

(2) Even with verse numbers added, the interlinearizer tool doesn’t work in GLO. I’m guessing this is because there is no appropriate model text. But there’s no way of telling. There’s no error. The tool opens but won’t go past 1:0 (chapter 1, verse 0), even as I navigate through verses (in both the project text and the corresponding BT text).

Hack: After adding verse markup to the Glossary, I can copy the GLO text into some chapter of Scripture that hasn’t be translated yet. (Our glossary has 82 entries right now, so I chose Numbers 7, a nice long chapter.) The interlinearizer now works (but in NUM). I can interlinearize the glossary, copy the results from NUM to the GLO book of the BT, then remove verse numbers - and delete NUM.

But is there a non-hacky way to do this? It would be nice for the interlinearizer to do two things: (1) treat \k like a verse in GLO so that we don’t have to add verse numbers, and (2) actually work in the GLO book.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
Paratext 由 (296 點) 提出 | 275 次瀏覽

2 個回答

+1 票
最佳回答

In Paratext 7 and 8, in the extra books, chapter and verse numbers worked mostly as they did in the normal books of scripture. There were problems, but you could navigate using chapter and verse numbers, both for the interlinearizer and for the same extra book in another language, such as translating a tract/story book, etc, from one language (eg.English or Lozi) to another, with the interlinearizer producing the glosses that could then be exported to a back translation document. If you to the end of a chapter and were trying to go to the next verse, it would not go to the next chapter, but choosing the next chapter in the tool bar would go there. This worked without any model text. In Paratext 9, this “feature” (if it was a feature) seems to have been broken. It would useful is this could be restored.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
由 (136 點) 提出
+1 票

I was told once that there is no support for verse numbers in the glossary or extra books (like XXA). It would also be a big help for our team if we could use the interlinearizer to back translate these books without adding verse numbers.

舊文章 - 以原文顯示
由 (1.3k 點) 提出

相關問題

0 票
6 個回答 1.3k 次瀏覽
我們有一個小型術語表(目前只有 1 頁),我們正在使用對照表工具(interlineariser)來提供回譯(back translations) 為了在最近的顧問檢查中進行列印輸出,並方便導航,我瀏覽了整個術語表並添加了節號,使用 \vp 來在出版時將 ... 工具完全停擺 有沒有什麼方法可以將術語表分段,讓對照表工具能夠接受?這方面的最佳實務是什麼?
anon542642 294 提出 已提問 2月 21, 2022
0 票
1 個回答 75 次瀏覽
我們在腳註交叉引用中使用 /xt,並設定為使用書卷的「簡稱」。但在術語表中,我想使用書卷名稱的縮寫,請問有沒有其他 USFM 代碼可以做到這一點?
Lenice 182 提出 已提問 10月 7, 2025
0 票
4 個回答 840 次瀏覽
我試圖使用一款可以顯示 Paratext Interlinearizer 詞典的軟體。 然而,Glossy 和 Glossinator(適用於 Paratext 8)都無法正常運作。執行 Glossy (go.bat) 時,螢幕上沒有顯示任何內容。Glossinator 8.exe 完全無法執行。 我想知道如何讓這些程式正常運作。
anon838041 109 提出 已提問 2月 9, 2022
0 票
3 個回答 576 次瀏覽
逐字對照工具(interlinearizer tool)中建議釋義的順序是什麼? 換句話說,如果您點選一個釋義並看到下拉式選單,該順序是否就是專案歷史中各種可能釋義被選取的順序?看起來似乎不是依頻率排序,但依頻率排序似乎才是最合乎邏輯的。
mnjames 1.9k 提出 已提問 9月 11, 2018
0 票
0 個回答 204 次瀏覽
Is there a way to extract the Find/Replace history from the Project History? I found that I could do this: ... other suggestions, I'd appreciate those as well. Thanks, james_post
[Moderator]
james_post
2.1k 提出
已提問 8月 6, 2020
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
They devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and to fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer.
Acts 2:42
3,060 個問題
6,021 個回答
5,689 則評論
2,035 位使用者