+1 suara
275 tampilan

There appear to be two obstacles to using the interlinearizer to create a Back Translation of the Glossary.

(1) The Glossary doesn’t have verse numbers. However, verse numbers can be temporarily added for breaking up the text for purposes of interlinearization, then removed.

(2) Even with verse numbers added, the interlinearizer tool doesn’t work in GLO. I’m guessing this is because there is no appropriate model text. But there’s no way of telling. There’s no error. The tool opens but won’t go past 1:0 (chapter 1, verse 0), even as I navigate through verses (in both the project text and the corresponding BT text).

Hack: After adding verse markup to the Glossary, I can copy the GLO text into some chapter of Scripture that hasn’t be translated yet. (Our glossary has 82 entries right now, so I chose Numbers 7, a nice long chapter.) The interlinearizer now works (but in NUM). I can interlinearize the glossary, copy the results from NUM to the GLO book of the BT, then remove verse numbers - and delete NUM.

But is there a non-hacky way to do this? It would be nice for the interlinearizer to do two things: (1) treat \k like a verse in GLO so that we don’t have to add verse numbers, and (2) actually work in the GLO book.

Postingan lama - ditampilkan dalam bahasa aslinya
Paratext oleh (296 poin) | 275 tampilan

2 Jawaban

+1 suara
Jawaban terbaik

In Paratext 7 and 8, in the extra books, chapter and verse numbers worked mostly as they did in the normal books of scripture. There were problems, but you could navigate using chapter and verse numbers, both for the interlinearizer and for the same extra book in another language, such as translating a tract/story book, etc, from one language (eg.English or Lozi) to another, with the interlinearizer producing the glosses that could then be exported to a back translation document. If you to the end of a chapter and were trying to go to the next verse, it would not go to the next chapter, but choosing the next chapter in the tool bar would go there. This worked without any model text. In Paratext 9, this “feature” (if it was a feature) seems to have been broken. It would useful is this could be restored.

Postingan lama - ditampilkan dalam bahasa aslinya
oleh (136 poin)
+1 suara

I was told once that there is no support for verse numbers in the glossary or extra books (like XXA). It would also be a big help for our team if we could use the interlinearizer to back translate these books without adding verse numbers.

Postingan lama - ditampilkan dalam bahasa aslinya
oleh (1,3k poin)

Pertanyaan terkait

0 suara
6 jawaban 1,3k tampilan
Kami memiliki glosarium kecil (saat ini 1 halaman), dan kami menggunakan interlineariser untuk menyediakan terjemahan ... oleh interlineariser? Apa praktik terbaik untuk ini?
anon542642 294 bertanya Feb 21, 2022
0 suara
1 jawaban 75 tampilan
Kami menggunakan /xt dalam silang rujuk catatan kaki, diatur untuk menggunakan 'nama pendek' kitab. Tetapi di glosarium, ... ada kode USFM lain yang bisa saya gunakan untuk itu?
Lenice 182 bertanya Okt 7, 2025
0 suara
4 jawaban 840 tampilan
Saya sedang mencoba menggunakan perangkat lunak yang menampilkan leksikon dari Paratext Interlinearizer. Namun, baik Glossy ... membuat program-program ini berfungsi dengan baik.
anon838041 109 bertanya Feb 9, 2022
0 suara
3 jawaban 576 tampilan
Bagaimana urutan glosa yang disarankan di alat interlinearizer? Dengan kata lain, jika Anda mengklik sebuah glosa ... berdasarkan frekuensi, meskipun itu tampaknya paling logis.
mnjames 1,9k bertanya Sep 11, 2018
0 suara
0 jawaban 204 tampilan
Is there a way to extract the Find/Replace history from the Project History? I found that I could do this: ... other suggestions, I'd appreciate those as well. Thanks, james_post
[Moderator]
james_post
2,1k
bertanya Agu 6, 2020
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
If anyone destroys God’s temple, God will destroy that person; for God’s temple is sacred, and you together are that temple.
1 Corinthians 3:17
3,060 pertanyaan
6,021 jawaban
5,689 komentar
2,035 pengguna