+1 voto
275 vistas

There appear to be two obstacles to using the interlinearizer to create a Back Translation of the Glossary.

(1) The Glossary doesn’t have verse numbers. However, verse numbers can be temporarily added for breaking up the text for purposes of interlinearization, then removed.

(2) Even with verse numbers added, the interlinearizer tool doesn’t work in GLO. I’m guessing this is because there is no appropriate model text. But there’s no way of telling. There’s no error. The tool opens but won’t go past 1:0 (chapter 1, verse 0), even as I navigate through verses (in both the project text and the corresponding BT text).

Hack: After adding verse markup to the Glossary, I can copy the GLO text into some chapter of Scripture that hasn’t be translated yet. (Our glossary has 82 entries right now, so I chose Numbers 7, a nice long chapter.) The interlinearizer now works (but in NUM). I can interlinearize the glossary, copy the results from NUM to the GLO book of the BT, then remove verse numbers - and delete NUM.

But is there a non-hacky way to do this? It would be nice for the interlinearizer to do two things: (1) treat \k like a verse in GLO so that we don’t have to add verse numbers, and (2) actually work in the GLO book.

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
Paratext por (296 puntos) | 275 vistas

2 Respuestas

+1 voto
Mejor respuesta

In Paratext 7 and 8, in the extra books, chapter and verse numbers worked mostly as they did in the normal books of scripture. There were problems, but you could navigate using chapter and verse numbers, both for the interlinearizer and for the same extra book in another language, such as translating a tract/story book, etc, from one language (eg.English or Lozi) to another, with the interlinearizer producing the glosses that could then be exported to a back translation document. If you to the end of a chapter and were trying to go to the next verse, it would not go to the next chapter, but choosing the next chapter in the tool bar would go there. This worked without any model text. In Paratext 9, this “feature” (if it was a feature) seems to have been broken. It would useful is this could be restored.

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
por (136 puntos)
+1 voto

I was told once that there is no support for verse numbers in the glossary or extra books (like XXA). It would also be a big help for our team if we could use the interlinearizer to back translate these books without adding verse numbers.

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
por (1,3k puntos)

Preguntas relacionadas

0 votos
6 respuestas 1,3k vistas
Contamos con un glosario pequeño (actualmente de 1 página) y estamos utilizando la herramienta de interlinearización para ... acepte? Cuál es la mejor práctica para esto?
anon542642 294 preguntada feb 21, 2022
0 votos
1 respuesta 75 vistas
Estamos usando /xt en las referencias cruzadas de las notas al pie, configurado para usar el 'nombre corto' del libro ... hay algún código USFM diferente que pueda usar para eso?
Lenice 182 preguntada oct 7, 2025
0 votos
4 respuestas 840 vistas
Estoy intentando usar un software que muestre un léxico del Interlinearizador de Paratext. Sin embargo, tanto ... cómo puedo hacer que estos programas funcionen correctamente.
anon838041 109 preguntada feb 9, 2022
0 votos
3 respuestas 576 vistas
Cuál es el orden de las glosas sugeridas en la herramienta interlinear? En otras palabras, si hace clic en una ... esté ordenado por frecuencia, aunque eso parece lo más lógico.
mnjames 1,9k preguntada sep 11, 2018
0 votos
0 respuestas 204 vistas
Is there a way to extract the Find/Replace history from the Project History? I found that I could do this: ... other suggestions, I'd appreciate those as well. Thanks, james_post
[Moderator]
james_post
2,1k
preguntada ago 6, 2020
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace.
Ephesians 4:3
3,060 preguntas
6,021 respuestas
5,689 comentarios
2,035 usuarios