0
482 次浏览

Is it possible to constrain the Spellcheck tool to the current book?

When we get a new typed first draft, one of the first things we do is check spelling and word breaks. We have done this for a number of books already, so many decisions have been made. Unfortunately, when we use the Spellcheck tool (right-click a red or grey underlined word and select the appropriate ‘Suggestion’) many of these decisions get undone if one isn’t careful… For example:

/mana/ ~ /ma na/

Both are legitimate. There are many examples like this. If one was to select one of the ‘Suggestions’ and click ‘Yes to all’, it would potentially undo a /lot/ of work already done. On the other hand, if one was to click ‘Yes’ or 'No for every instance, one could waste a /lot/ of time going over books that have already been done… However, if there was a checkbox for ‘Current book’ (like Find / Replace has), it would mean a lot fewer clicks. And a lot less potential of undoing a lot of work that has already been done in other books.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
Paratext (642 分) 发布 | 482 次浏览

2 个回答

0

Dear Paul,

I’m a little confused about how your decisions get “undone”. Are you making
decisions in the Wordlist Tool (or with the right click selection) or are
you simply correcting the spelling as you go through the document.

If you come across the words “ma na” and manually change them to “mana” and
then in a later book come across “mana” and right click it to change it to
"ma na" then yes, you will undo the first change (if you do Yes to all).
The problem here is not necessarily constraining the check to a single
book, but the fact that you have minimal pairs and need to look at them. It
would be better to use the Wordlist Tool (Tools > Wordlist) to look at
those. In the Tool you can constrain the search, but corrections will
always be made to all words. The assumption is that if a word is wrong in
Matthew then it is wrong in Mark as well.

Using the Wordlist tool the idea is that if a word is underlined and you
right click it you are providing the correct form for all occurrences.
Again, with minimal pairs this is dangerous.

In the specific case you mention where both mana and ma na are valid you
should work through the “Find Incorrectly Joined or Split” words tool found
in the Tools menu of the Wordlist. Once you have marked the minimal pairs
as correct they will not show up as underlined.

It is possible with the replace tool to replace only the words in a
specific book, but this does not change the status of the word to
incorrect. (Even if you use the replace within the Wordlist)

For me, it is best to start working in the Wordlist tool and correct words
there - then use the underlining as a way to find other words in context or
to pick out words that get mis-typed.

I don’t know if that helps or muddies the water - I’d be happy to look at
this remotely if you want to talk about it some more.

Blessings,

anon848905
Americas Area Language Technology Coordinator
[Email Removed]
[Phone Removed]Office at JAARS)
[Phone Removed]Cell)
Skype name: anon848905

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
(9.9k 分) 发布
0

One other comment about using the Wordlist tool to look at this.

If for example you are concerned about the word “mana” in Philippians. When
you are in the wordlist tool you can constrain the concordance view to only
show Philippians and then you can “look” at the words without having to see
the previous books. However, when you constrain the list to only one book
you can’t “see” the previously made decisions. I usually vote for seeing as
much as possible for comparison purposes. If the list shows all the words
you can see that you previously spelled it “maana”.

anon848905
Americas Area Language Technology Coordinator
[Email Removed]
[Phone Removed]Office at JAARS)
[Phone Removed]Cell)
Skype name: anon848905

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
(9.9k 分) 发布

相关问题

+1
2 个回答 434 次浏览
We want to spell check just the current book. So we chose Checking > Spell check current book. It correctly shows ... this a bug or are we doing something wrong? Thanks anon703820
anon703820 222 发布 提问于 二月 22, 2019
0
3 个回答 625 次浏览
I'm working in a context where we are standardizing spellings, and I'm just exploring some of the spellchecking tools ... in the syllabic script only. Any ideas would be welcome,
MW 发布 提问于 十二月 11, 2018
0
2 个回答 528 次浏览
From this screenshot, you can see that lots of words still have grey underlines. But when I do Spellcheck Current Book ... four unknown words. Can anyone tell me what's happening?
wdavidhj 1.4k 发布 提问于 六月 15, 2016
0
1 个回答 72 次浏览
我为一名新的 MTT 创建了一个辅助项目 作为他培训的一部分,我希望他检查其他 MTT 翻译的文本初稿 我已经将主项目中几个由 MTT 翻译的章节文本复制到了辅助项目中 我要求新 MTT 做的一件事就是进行拼写更正 因此,我希望辅助文本能 ... 有没有办法实现这一点?还是说我每次想要更新时都需要手动复制该文件?或者有没有更好的方法来实现我想做的事情?谢谢
Kirk 123 发布 提问于 五月 8, 2025
0
3 个回答 269 次浏览
拥有次经(例如 XXD)权限的用户无法使用右键菜单中的“Correct Spelling”(更正拼写)选项来更正拼写错误的单词,系统会显示一条消息,称未找到任何匹配项(尽管实际上存在一个)。然而,该拼写错误仍被标记为“incorrect”(不正确)。我们做错了什么?
drwww 448 发布 提问于 九月 17, 2020
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it.
Matthew 16:18
3,048 个问题
6,007 个回答
5,672 条评论
2,027 位用户