+2 票
250 次浏览

Hi,
We have a hunspell-based spell-checking dictionary. Other than
trying to programatically generate a humongous word-list to cover every possible combination of root+affix (+affix) that it allows, is there any way of getting Paratext to use it?

anon542642

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
Paratext 中 由 (294 分) 发布
已重新显示 | 250 次浏览

1 个回答

0 票
最佳答案

I don’t remember how I did it… I could try to look up notes if needed… but I expanded a hunspell dictionary into a PT wordlist using some pre-existing program for creating all possible combinations. The resulting file was large, but works perfectly fine. Is there a reason you want to use the dictionary directly instead of going that route?

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示
由 (1.9k 分) 发布

mnjames
February 14

I don’t remember how I did it… I could try to look up notes if needed… but I
expanded a hunspell dictionary into a PT wordlist using some pre-existing
program for creating all possible combinations. The resulting file was large,
but works perfectly fine.

Practically speaking, the resultant list will be getting very large - every
verb potentially turns into multiple participles, and every participle can act
as a nominal and each then end up in sg/plural versions in nominative,
oblique(accusative), locative, dative, ablative, genitive (aggreeing with
gender and number of the posessed item) cases and that doesn’t add up to the
right number so I’ve forgotten some.

Is there a reason you want to use the dictionary
directly instead of going that route?

Ideally, yes:
The dictionary is still being worked on, and sometimes errors are
spotted, or decisions about spelling get revisited, especially for
loan words where there are several options about which noun class
they might go in: that’s a language-community-preference thing
that might develop over time.

Ideally I’d hope there could be a way for paratext’s current version
of manually checked words (e.g. for names of one-off towns, ancient kings,
etc) to sit beside the hunspell dict.

I’ve never looked at the ParaText code, but I’d assume there would be benefits
in using the Enchant library (https://abiword.github.io/enchant/),
as that’s backend-agnostic.

anon542642

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示

There is the laboursome possibility to do spellchecking in Indesign, (which supports hunspell). It means exporting via PubAssist into Indesign, and then do a round-trip back to sfm files.

较早的帖子 - 以原始语言显示

相关问题

0 票
1 个回答 347 次浏览
Paratext 社区的朋友们,大家好, 我目前正在从事一项基于 ESV 全球研究圣经(ESV Global Study Bible)的研究圣经本地化工作 目前,基础圣经文本已在 Paratext 中可用,而扩展脚注 研究注释和侧边栏则保存在 Word 文 ... 类似研究圣经迁移或本地化项目的经验,我将非常感激您的指导 建议或高效工作流程的示例 谢谢!
Thiyagarajan 112 发布 提问于 九月 7
0 票
1 个回答 55 次浏览
有一位我目前无法联系的人,曾帮助我将旧约人名数据从圣经术语 XML 文件中提取到一个 Excel 表格中。术语、类别(人名)以及英文原文均已提取,且顺序与工具中的顺序一致。我随后已对这些人名进行了音译,现在准备将它们重新导入工具中。我希望在工具中将这些人名作为已批准的译法。否则,我将不得不复制粘贴超过 4000 个条目。您对此有何建议?
Clear7419 251 发布 提问于 五月 13, 2025
Paratext 中
0 票
2 个回答 212 次浏览
有一个社区联系我们,他们一直在自行翻译圣经,现在希望得到帮助以完成这项工作。文本存储在 Word 中,具有基本格式但没有段落样式。目前没有 usfm 文件。为了有效地帮助他们,我们需要将文本导入 Paratext。您应该从哪里开始为文本添加 usfm 标记?我知道肯定有人以前做过类似的事情——您能给我们一些建议吗?
anon399461 123 发布 提问于 十一月 8, 2024
0 票
2 个回答 360 次浏览
是否可以将 FLEx 中的逐词对照文本导入 PT9? 谢谢
listentwice 1.2k 发布 提问于 四月 8, 2022
+1 票
2 个回答 685 次浏览
有人问我是否有办法将旧版交叉引用文件导出/转换为 Paratext 8-9 可以使用的格式 以下是原始文件的格式: \id Cross References Canonical Sequence \rem B.C, S.C \rem ... ref GEN 2:2 \x - \xo 2:2-3 \xt EXO 20:11\x* 谢谢! james_post
[Moderator]
james_post
2.1k 发布
提问于 一月 31, 2022
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
If anyone destroys God’s temple, God will destroy that person; for God’s temple is sacred, and you together are that temple.
1 Corinthians 3:17
3,052 个问题
6,011 个回答
5,677 条评论
2,032 位用户