+2 suara
248 tampilan

Hi,
We have a hunspell-based spell-checking dictionary. Other than
trying to programatically generate a humongous word-list to cover every possible combination of root+affix (+affix) that it allows, is there any way of getting Paratext to use it?

anon542642

Postingan lama - ditampilkan dalam bahasa aslinya
Paratext oleh (294 poin)
ditampilkan kembali | 248 tampilan

1 Jawaban

0 suara
Jawaban terbaik

I don’t remember how I did it… I could try to look up notes if needed… but I expanded a hunspell dictionary into a PT wordlist using some pre-existing program for creating all possible combinations. The resulting file was large, but works perfectly fine. Is there a reason you want to use the dictionary directly instead of going that route?

Postingan lama - ditampilkan dalam bahasa aslinya
oleh (1,9k poin)

mnjames
February 14

I don’t remember how I did it… I could try to look up notes if needed… but I
expanded a hunspell dictionary into a PT wordlist using some pre-existing
program for creating all possible combinations. The resulting file was large,
but works perfectly fine.

Practically speaking, the resultant list will be getting very large - every
verb potentially turns into multiple participles, and every participle can act
as a nominal and each then end up in sg/plural versions in nominative,
oblique(accusative), locative, dative, ablative, genitive (aggreeing with
gender and number of the posessed item) cases and that doesn’t add up to the
right number so I’ve forgotten some.

Is there a reason you want to use the dictionary
directly instead of going that route?

Ideally, yes:
The dictionary is still being worked on, and sometimes errors are
spotted, or decisions about spelling get revisited, especially for
loan words where there are several options about which noun class
they might go in: that’s a language-community-preference thing
that might develop over time.

Ideally I’d hope there could be a way for paratext’s current version
of manually checked words (e.g. for names of one-off towns, ancient kings,
etc) to sit beside the hunspell dict.

I’ve never looked at the ParaText code, but I’d assume there would be benefits
in using the Enchant library (https://abiword.github.io/enchant/),
as that’s backend-agnostic.

anon542642

Postingan lama - ditampilkan dalam bahasa aslinya

There is the laboursome possibility to do spellchecking in Indesign, (which supports hunspell). It means exporting via PubAssist into Indesign, and then do a round-trip back to sfm files.

Postingan lama - ditampilkan dalam bahasa aslinya

Pertanyaan terkait

0 suara
1 jawaban 347 tampilan
Halo Komunitas Paratext, Saat ini saya sedang mengerjakan Alkitab Studi berdasarkan ESV Global Study Bible, yang sedang kami ... atau contoh alur kerja yang efisien. Terima kasih!
Thiyagarajan 112 bertanya Sep 7
0 suara
1 jawaban 55 tampilan
Seseorang, yang saat ini tidak bisa saya akses, membantu saya mengekstrak data nama-nama Perjanjian Lama dari XML ... kali. Apakah Anda punya ide tentang cara melakukan ini?
Clear7419 251 bertanya Mei 13, 2025
0 suara
2 jawaban 212 tampilan
Kami telah didekati oleh sebuah komunitas yang telah menerjemahkan Alkitab secara mandiri dan sekarang membutuhkan bantuan untuk ... tips apa yang bisa Anda berikan kepada kami?
anon399461 123 bertanya Nov 8, 2024
0 suara
2 jawaban 360 tampilan
Apakah mungkin untuk mengimpor teks interlinear dari FLEx ke PT9? Terima kasih
listentwice 1,2k bertanya Apr 8, 2022
+1 suara
2 jawaban 685 tampilan
Saya ditanya apakah ada cara untuk mengekspor/mengonversi file silang-rujukan yang lebih lama ke format yang dapat digunakan oleh ... 3 \xt EXO 20:11\x* Terima kasih! james_post
[Moderator]
james_post
2,1k
bertanya Jan 31, 2022
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
For where two or three gather in my name, there am I with them.
Matthew 18:20
3,052 pertanyaan
6,011 jawaban
5,677 komentar
2,032 pengguna