0 votes
748 views

Footnote callers should have a space after them (or before if the caller comes ahead of what it refers to, ESV-style). Is there a PT automatic check that will flag the case where the translator forgets to type that space?

Paratext by (1.4k points) | 748 views

2 Answers

0 votes
Best answer

I don’t believe there is an automatic check built into Paratext. This is
the kind of thing i use Regular Expressions to look for. A simple check for
no space might look like:

regex:\\[fx]\*[^\s]

This should find as a regular expression any \f* or \x* followed by
something that is not a space.

anon848905
Americas Area Language Technology Coordinator
[Email Removed]
[Phone Removed]Office at JAARS)
[Phone Removed]Cell)
Skype name: anon848905

by (9.8k points)
reshown

Did you mean:

regex:[fx]\*[^\s]

?

No, I meant: (and in my sent items it show)

two backslashes before the [fx] and a backslash before the *

For some reason it got clobbered before it came out. This appears to be a problem with the way the Supporters site handles html. You actually have to double escape characters to get the to work correctly in the output. So what would need to be written in an email is:
regex:\\\\[fx]\\*[^\s]

anon848905
Americas Area Language Technology Coordinator
[Email Removed]
[Phone Removed]Office at JAARS)
[Phone Removed]Cell)
Skype name: anon848905

This worked best for me:

regex:\\[fx]\*[^»“\)\]\}\-\s]

(where » and “ are the two types of close quotes we use in our language.)

The above finds callers that are definitely in the wrong place. Then I recheck the ones before close quotes, which may or may not be correct.

@anon848905, if you put four spaces at the start of a line and a blank line before, it will be indented and formatted monospaced … plus, all backslashes are treated as literal backslashes, removing the need to double escape them.

Oh, and this works nicely, particularly in RegEx Pal, to highlight the whole footnote, but not the punctuation or other character that follows:

\\f .*\\[fx]\*(?![\)\]\}»“\-\s])

You might want to use this:

\\(f|x) .*?\\\1\*(?![\)\]\}»“\-\s])

\\(f|x) Look for footnotes or cross references
.*? “Non-greedy” (i.e. “match as little as possible”) for cases where there’s more than one footnote/cross ref per verse
\\ A backslash
\1 Either an f or an x
\*(?![\)\]\}»“\-\s]) Same as your expression

Thanks. You added the professional touch!

0 votes

If you found this topic interesting, then also see this thread.

by (1.4k points)

Related questions

0 votes
1 answer 492 views
(Also see this thread.) Most publications that I read in English (including English Wikipedia) put footnote callers outside ... regex for it, I'll add it to this thread.
wdavidhj 1.4k asked Jun 26, 2017
0 votes
1 answer 217 views
The character entered after the opening marker indicates what caller will be used in the text. In Unformatted view, you ... view, the character(s) you define will be displayed.
[Expert]
anon421222
735
asked Feb 23, 2017
0 votes
2 answers 43 views
Hi all, I'm working with a project that previously marked all footnote callers manually. Now, we have started ... , so I could just be missing something. Thanks, Aaron
PecanMango 112 asked Nov 6, 2024
0 votes
2 answers 36 views
I must have changed the location of the footnote caller to be put by default at the beginning of the selected portion of ... it? Is there an easier way than to move them manually?
PeterK 119 asked May 5, 2025
0 votes
2 answers 505 views
When I change the footnote callers to automatically-created callers, I get errors in the basic checks. I'm sure there is ... m missing somewhere, but I can't seem to find where!
anon928451 127 asked Feb 13, 2023
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
May the God who gives endurance and encouragement give you the same attitude of mind toward each other that Christ Jesus had.
Romans 15:5
3,037 questions
5,994 answers
5,661 comments
2,022 users