0 votos
398 vistas

I’m having trouble using \w … \w* markers when the word in the text is a different form of the word than is in the glossary.

I found in the online USFM documentation that I should be using a pipe (by the way, is there a pdf version of the USFM 3.0 documentation?).

When I type something like \w ہِرودِ|ہِرود\w* (note the small vowel point under the last letter) it solves my “Citation Form (“ہِرودِ”) is missing from the glossary: \w” errors, but both words are still showing in the text. No matter which of the views I go to (Preview, Basic, Formatted, Unformatted, or Standard) both words show.

In Preview view, which would typically remove the \w markers and replace them with a * before the word, the markers are gone but the * is not present.

Basic view is the only place where the glossary version (the second of the two words) is grayed out.

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
Paratext por (1,9k puntos)
mostrada de nuevo | 398 vistas

2 Respuestas

0 votos
Mejor respuesta

Which version of Paratext are you using? What stylesheet is the project using?

I tried it in version 8.0.100.63 and it seems to work fine in a test project (Standard view):
image

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
por [Expert]
(16,7k puntos)

I’m using 8.0.100.62.

In looking at stylesheets, I noticed my usfm.sty is version 2.503. Has usfm.sty version 3.0 not been incorporated into PT yet?

There was a fairly innocuous line in custom.sty pertaining to \w, but I removed it to no effect.

I’m not seeing that grayed out look in Standard view.

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original

No, the USFM 3.0 specification was only finalized a couple months ago so it has not been incorporated into any released version of Paratext, yet. Support for USFM 3.0 will be in 8.1 when it releases later this year.

However, having a pipe separating the parts of \w was in before USFM 3.0 so the version of the stylesheet you have should be fine. Could you tell me the name of the project with the problem (if it’s not sensitive)?

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original

I’ve sent an email.

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
+1 voto

In case someone else has a similar issue, it turns out it was caused by the spell checking. If the word following the pipe (’|’) was marked as incorrectly spelled (or unknown), that caused the word to not show up in its typical gray color.

Publicación antigua - se muestra en su idioma original
por [Expert]
(16,7k puntos)

Preguntas relacionadas

0 votos
0 respuestas 182 vistas
Paratext solo puede ordenar automáticamente las entradas del glosario que estén correctamente vinculadas en la herramienta de ... cambiado y que ya no se ordenen correctamente.
[Expert]
Jeff_Shrum
2,9k
preguntada mar 23, 2021
0 votos
1 respuesta 421 vistas
I'm working on basic checks for a project, and it keeps coming up with Citation form (x) is missing from glossary every ... difference. (P.S. I am using Paratext 8.0.100.84)
Rɔnelh 199 preguntada nov 16, 2019
0 votos
1 respuesta 35 vistas
Estamos usando /xt en las referencias cruzadas de las notas al pie, configurado para usar el 'nombre corto' del libro ... hay algún código USFM diferente que pueda usar para eso?
Lenice 180 preguntada oct 7, 2025
+1 voto
1 respuesta 358 vistas
Cuando introduce entradas del glosario a través de la herramienta de términos bíblicos o de la ventana de ... El siguiente vídeo describe este procedimiento con más detalle:
[Expert]
Jeff_Shrum
2,9k
preguntada mar 23, 2021
0 votos
1 respuesta 371 vistas
Soy administrador en este proyecto. Otro administrador ha realizado cambios en GLO y en otros libros y ha ejecutado send/ ... proyecto, pero no se han actualizado en el libro GLO.
anon399461 123 preguntada mar 13, 2024
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it.
Matthew 16:18
3,048 preguntas
6,007 respuestas
5,672 comentarios
2,027 usuarios