0 votes
492 views

(Also see this thread.)

Most publications that I read in English (including English Wikipedia) put footnote callers outside punctuation:

  • “Like this!”,* he said \ * or that.
  • Not “Like this*!”, he said \ * or that.

(I guess they’re outside because otherwise they create and ugly gap between the text and the punctuation that immediately follows. On the other hand, when the caller is outside quotation marks, that makes it look like the footnote refers to the entire quotation, when it may only refer to the last word or phrase.)

Anyway, it would be nice to be able to check the consistency of these, whether your preferred style is outside or inside.

Like the “also see …” I have referred to above, I guess there’s no built-in check for this. If I write a regex for it, I’ll add it to this thread.

Paratext by (1.4k points)
reshown | 492 views

1 Answer

0 votes

This expression should work:

> regex:\\[xf]\*\p{P}

This says look for any x* or f* followed by Unicode punctuation. If you didn’t want the cross references you could simply remove the x.

by (9.8k points)
reshown

Should that not be:

regex:[xf]*\p{P}

This email list just removed the backslash from before the asterisk.

regex:[xf]--*\p{P}

(remove the hyphens before and after the \ )

regex:[xf]\*\p{P} will also work. It just doesn’t mach the backslash before the x* or f* markers.

Related questions

0 votes
2 answers 749 views
Footnote callers should have a space after them (or before if the caller comes ahead of what it refers to, ESV- ... flag the case where the translator forgets to type that space?
wdavidhj 1.4k asked Oct 22, 2015
0 votes
1 answer 217 views
The character entered after the opening marker indicates what caller will be used in the text. In Unformatted view, you ... view, the character(s) you define will be displayed.
[Expert]
anon421222
735
asked Feb 23, 2017
0 votes
2 answers 43 views
Hi all, I'm working with a project that previously marked all footnote callers manually. Now, we have started ... , so I could just be missing something. Thanks, Aaron
PecanMango 112 asked Nov 6, 2024
0 votes
2 answers 36 views
I must have changed the location of the footnote caller to be put by default at the beginning of the selected portion of ... it? Is there an easier way than to move them manually?
PeterK 119 asked May 5, 2025
0 votes
2 answers 505 views
When I change the footnote callers to automatically-created callers, I get errors in the basic checks. I'm sure there is ... m missing somewhere, but I can't seem to find where!
anon928451 127 asked Feb 13, 2023
Welcome to Support Bible, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
Give proper recognition to those widows who are really in need.
1 Timothy 5:3
3,037 questions
5,994 answers
5,661 comments
2,022 users