我认为双栏版在段落级别上保持平衡是相当标准的做法。如果项目设置为按节样式（每节作为一个新段落——这可以通过更改文件来实现），那么每节都可以对齐。
这是选择双栏版文本时需要考虑的一个因素——段落是否匹配。如果两者差异很大，读者可能会质疑原因。对于文本中的其他格式，如章节标题、诗歌等，也是如此。
另一个考虑因素（也许更重要）是文本之间的吻合程度。许多阅读英文的人喜欢比较不同的译本（例如 NASB / NLT），但对于许多人来说，看到与主要语言文本差异很大的文本可能会带来问题，并引发对翻译有效性的怀疑。
通常，我建议想要或需要制作双栏版的团队使用匹配的文本，或者调整他们的文本以匹配双栏版。这显然不是一个简单的问题，因为文本显然是经过有意格式化的。
I believe it is pretty standard to have diglots balance at paragraph level. If a project is set up for verse style (each verse is a new paragraph - and this can be done in a change file) then each verse can match.
This is one consideration when choosing a diglot text - do the paragraphs match. If they are very different then it can raise questions for the reader as to why. The same would be true of other formats in the text like section heads, poetry, etc.
Another consideration (maybe more important) is how closely do the texts follow. Many of us who read English like to compare texts that differ (NASB / NLT for instance), but for many people seeing a text that differs significantly from a majority language text can be problematic and raise doubts as to the validity of the translation.
Generally I would advise teams that want/need to do diglot to use a text that matches or to adjust their text to match the diglot. This is obviously not a trivial matter since presumably the text has been formatted intentionally.
机器翻译自 English
